To: narses
If the UCMJ statute is irrelevant to your position, why do you keep bringing it up? Seems like a diversionary rhetorical tactic to me, but perhaps I misunderstand your purpose.
54 posted on
03/18/2004 8:18:14 PM PST by
AntiGuv
(When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
To: AntiGuv
I neither claimed the UCMJ nor the many state laws as a "trump card" nor did I concede that it is 'irrelevant'. Your strawman and red herring tactics reveal the paucity of your logical and rhetorical weapons.
66 posted on
03/18/2004 8:34:01 PM PST by
narses
(If you want OFF or ON my Catholic Ping list, please email me. +)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson