And this is where the rubber hits the road IMO. It's also the problem I have with the Libertarian (big L) movement. They claim a desire to return to the ideals of the Founding Fathers as how this nation of states should be run. The problem is that with a return to a Republic, we must also return to the limitations set within that same Republic. If California wants homosexuals to run wild all over their state, that's their d#mn problem.
But here in NC, we have laws that were in place that dealt with homosexuality, adultery, and fornication. The problem was that it became unpopular, un-PC to enforce them over the past 40 years. It wasn't that the ideals of native North Carolinians have changed all that much over the years, but moreso that the ridicule coming from transplants, national news, etc. has quashed what once made our state what it was. Considering the direction this nation of states has run for the past 40 years, I'd say somebody goofed in not continuing enforcement of those laws
Exactly. But here you have an alleged "deacon" arguing for repealing laws that are consistant with the teachings of Our Lord. See the problem?