Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: narses
Wow. You really need to study both general hsitory and legal history. You ARE claiming that America and the Taliban have the same structure with your posts. That is amazing.

On the contrary, I compared the system you propose and the Taliban. I denied that America fit the system you describe. While America has and still does to some degree "legislate morality," it does not nearly do so on the scale or as thoroughly as the system you describe.

I will admit that structurally, your system would more democratic than that of the Taliban. It's possible that the punishments given by the Taliban would be harsher than the ones in your system- though also possible they would be as harsh. What's important, though, is that they would both give the government the same power, and would both violate individual rights and the rule of law.

178 posted on 03/18/2004 10:15:37 PM PST by timm22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: timm22; narses
Most people understand that no one can "legislate morality." But most people don't understand what that phrase actually means.

The phrase refers to an attempt to legally force individuals to to what is good--an impossibility.

Thus, legislation remains 'negative'--that is, it can only prohibit those actions which are bad.
198 posted on 03/19/2004 4:50:37 AM PST by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson