[narses]

So our laws ought to allow fornication, adultery and homosexual activity. Wow. What age would you choose (and why) for this activity to be legal? What about other "crimes against nature", such as bestiality and incest? If you support keeping them illegal, while you support legalizing fornication, adultery and homosex, why? What is different? How about polygamy and gay weddings?

[sinkspur]

Why not drunk in one's own home?

[AntiGuv]

So our laws ought to allow fornication, adultery and homosexual activity.

Of course they should. Don't be ridiculous.

What age would you choose (and why) for this activity to be legal?

18. Unless both are minors.

What about other "crimes against nature", such as bestiality and incest?

No and no.

If you support keeping them illegal, while you support legalizing fornication, adultery and homosex, why?

I would prohibit bestiality as a form of animal cruelty. Bestial relations are almost always rape. I would prohibit incest due to the inherent sociolegal asymmetry of the relationship and due to the dubious consensuality in most cases.

How about polygamy and gay weddings?

No and yes (but not via judicial edict or by ignoring the laws).

[tinacart]

I'm not Catholic (but adore Mel!), but agree with you 100% as a Christian. BTW, on our radio this morning Armstrong and Getty were degrading and mocking Tenneseeans (and the "holler" dialect) - born in Cleveland, TN (Gum Holler) and proud of it. Guess that's why I still possess common sense, know right from wrong (down from up), and good from evil, even after being indoctrinated in the socialist state of Cali for 38 years!