Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: narses
I reject anyone to the extent that they are wrong and embrace anyone to the extent that they are right. Some people are more wrong than others. Some people far more so. Case in point.

By further example, Osama bin Laden condemns homosexuality. Obviously you embrace his position on that count. I assume that you reject him in other matters, however.

Thomas Jefferson was right much more often than he was wrong. He was not right by virtue of Thomas Jefferson in those instances where he was right.
123 posted on 03/18/2004 9:23:37 PM PST by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: narses
He was not right by virtue of being Thomas Jefferson in those instances where he was right.
127 posted on 03/18/2004 9:25:52 PM PST by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: AntiGuv
You have yet to articulate what moral code you derive your sense of right and wrong from. You reject the Corpus Juris Civilis of Western Civilization, so you ought to be willing to ID where your code comes from and why it ought to supplant the Great Body of Laws that are our common heritage and the FOUNDATION of our form of government and culture.
129 posted on 03/18/2004 9:27:20 PM PST by narses (If you want OFF or ON my Catholic Ping list, please email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson