To: Interesting Times
I'm not sure that means too much. The NYT wasn't as involved in subversive activities then as it is now. They may not have known better.
4 posted on
03/18/2004 5:37:34 PM PST by
VadeRetro
To: VadeRetro
They still would have confirmed titles with Kerry. They wouldn't name him as the spokesman/leader without his and/or the organizations say so.
11 posted on
03/18/2004 5:39:56 PM PST by
blanknoone
(Give Kerry enough nuance, and he will hang himself.)
To: VadeRetro
I'm not sure that means too much. The NYT wasn't as involved in subversive activities then as it is now. They may not have known better.You're kidding right?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson