To: sully777
Not quite sure what you're driving at, but the Islamic calendar is a lunar calendar.
On the other hand, the Persian calendar is a solar calendar.
40 posted on
03/18/2004 1:11:24 PM PST by
nuconvert
(CAUTION: I'm an acquaintance of someone labelled "an obstinate supporter of dangerous fantasies")
To: nuconvert
LOL!
41 posted on
03/18/2004 3:10:59 PM PST by
Pan_Yans Wife
(Much of your pain is self-chosen. --- Kahlil Gibran)
To: nuconvert
"Not quite sure what you're driving at"
The photos on FR show a festival environment, accented at times with defiance to the government. Put a few members of the western media in amongst the crowd (with the reporters not knowing/ignoring the religious implication of the assembly) and the media THINKS REVOLUTION, not celebration. It's an illusion, no?
IMO the radical islamists used the various islamic-persian celebration from July 1977 to March 1978 (calibrated to coincide with the lunar calendar) as a vehicle for their alternative political asperations. Had the Shah employed the same controls as the mullahs do today on external and internal media , the world may have been a different place.
IMO most people in 1977 and 1978 were out celebrating in the streets before western cameras, not in a popular uprising against the Shah. Therefore, I wonder if the reports on the FR are results of a popular uprising by the majority, or a celebration accented by a defiance by a minority. I'm sure it is a question in various media outlets and halls of world governments.
I'll wait and see.
49 posted on
03/19/2004 8:43:33 AM PST by
sully777
(Wealth through labor so that I may labor through wealth.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson