Which is incorrect. I don't.
By continuing your attacks on all who wish to point out the evils of homosexuality...
I'm attacking? Where am I attacking? You mean by pointing out misstatements and illogical arguments? That's attacking? So I should just let those misstatements and illogical arguments slide lest I be called a gay-rights activist? Please!
But you don't. You claim they may be misstatements or illogical, but I can only think of one instance where you point out the illogic. And your point was correct, except that you made it without looking into the issue at all.
In the mean time you bring up attacks against religious groups (when I talked about having seen some footage and saying I don't like such pictures), statistics in general (without even beginning to review the data presented to you), and the people who present them to you.
Believe you're being moderate and rational if you like. I define those words differently.
Shalom.