Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tdadams; little jeremiah
I simply disagree with you that you have any place to tell people in the next house or next state how they have to conform to your values.
____

You, of course, hold this same standard to gays who are making sure that "gay literature" and picture books are being placed in elementary schools right? You don't sound very consistent. In one breath, you say you understand gays are behaving in their own self interest, yet in another breath you verbally flog a conservative person for doing the same. A little consistency, please!

In the end though it gets down to you have to take a side. Either you side for the self-interest of parents and their children or you side for the self-interest of militant homosexuals. The two will never mesh so you can't live in a bubble and pretend like they will and I can't understand what is so damn wrong with children not having to be thrown into the sexual fray in kindergarten--it is abhorent to think this is acceptable when most kindergartners don't even register that their own parents had to have sexual intercourse to make them. The only thing that will mesh is if homosexuals go back to what they originally claimed to want--privacy in their bedrooms with tolerance for that privacy and the desire to be able to walk about in public without being physically attacked. Pushing your self-interest on other folk's children is not going to fly. People don't take kindly, and I speak as a parent, to having another person's idea of morality pushed on their children. I notice you call conservatives out on this, yet you don't seem to have the same disdain for homosexuals interested in forcing their version of morality on a nation. Like I said, it comes to taking a stand since the moral ideas here are polar opposites.
173 posted on 03/22/2004 5:32:01 AM PST by cupcakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: cupcakes
I'm not sure why you directed that long diatribe toward me since I've never even skirted anywhere near the issue of school curriculum.
176 posted on 03/22/2004 5:44:43 AM PST by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: cupcakes
The only thing that will mesh is if homosexuals go back to what they originally claimed to want--privacy in their bedrooms with tolerance for that privacy and the desire to be able to walk about in public without being physically attacked.

If they would accept this standard, I would march in their protests with them.

The problem is, they won'. Homosexual behavior is a symptom of a mental illness. It is actually one of the last steps in the complete dehumanization of man. The first steps were taken when heterosexuality was the norm and homosexuals had to fear the things you mention. Instead of standing firm for the truths that sustained us, in this case that human relationships are about much more than sexual gratification and marriage is about much more than a license to screw, then we wouldn't be in this mess now.

And the worst part is, the Church was complicit in the silence, which makes the Church culpable for where we are now. We need to be praying BIG-TIME for G-d to restore the Church if the Church is ever to have the power to restore America.

Shalom.

183 posted on 03/22/2004 7:17:28 AM PST by ArGee ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." - George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson