Skip to comments.
Mel Gibsons Joke?
Page Six Washington Post ^
| 3/17/04
| Richard Johnson
Posted on 03/17/2004 7:13:34 PM PST by OneVike
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:20:17 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
To: jocon307
Hi jocon. I guess it's one of those esoteric jokes that only a career bookworm can appreciate.
The academic equivalent of "make me a sammich"?
To: Cicero; obeylittle
It's perfectly true that some Jews were involved at high levels in Communist violence against Christians. Trotsky is one famous example. Bela Kun is another. That hardly excuses the holocaust, however. It also partly explains why some Ukrainians and Poles participated in killing Jews (while others came to their rescue). Regretably, the Jews they killed were not the guilty parties. They had earlier been victimized by Communist Jews, but they mostly went after religious Jews, who were easier to identify by their clothing. Christianity as such had nothing to do with it, nor did Judaism have anything to do with the misdeeds of some secular Jews
Where, oh where, in my God's Name, did you read, in my post that I was EXCUSING the deaths of six million Jewish souls at the hands of the atheistic Nazis? I am just embedding that horror fact among the other horror facts that do not have a narrative in our history.
I really never thought of the religious roots of the communists, because they obviously made Communism their religion.
42
posted on
03/18/2004 6:28:52 AM PST
by
mlmr
(Now that same sex marriage is legal, who will John Kerry marry next? Bill Gates? Warren Buffet?`12)
To: Burkeman1
And why is that line controversial? It's controversial because it's been taken out of context and misued by anti-Semites over the centuries for killing Jews. It's a line that if translated in the subtitles, would have bothered a number of people in the audience. It would have bothered me. It's one of those "difficult" lines that need proper explaining when it's presented.
That said, I do not believe that Mel Gibson meant to be anti-Semitic when he included the line. And since he discovered from target audiences that the line would bother people, he wisely left it untranslated in the subtitles.
43
posted on
03/18/2004 11:23:43 AM PST
by
Ciexyz
To: Arthur McGowan
"His blood be upon us and upon our children" is a BLESSING. I never thought of it in that way before, but you are right. There's salvation in the precious blood of Jesus. And Jesus himself forgave from the cross those who crucified him, so the Jewish leadership that plotted his death and whipped up the crowds would have been covered by that blessing. As would the spineless Pontius Pilate and the brutal Roman guards.
44
posted on
03/18/2004 11:27:20 AM PST
by
Ciexyz
To: Finalapproach29er
Your tag-line is LOL brilliant.
Blush!
45
posted on
03/18/2004 5:42:42 PM PST
by
mlmr
(Now that same sex marriage is legal, who will John Kerry marry next? Bill Gates? Warren Buffet?`12)
To: OneVike
Ancient languages can mean whatever you want them to mean.
They are called ancient because they have been forgotten.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson