Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iconoclast
Your so called free trade would better be called economic masturbation.

The totalitarian free trade ideology is as failed as Marxism. The market does not solve all problems in a way that's good for the USA. I'm sick of "deep thinkers" who are really nitwits, who think free markets solve all problems in a way compatible with humanity.
124 posted on 03/19/2004 3:13:20 AM PST by dennisw (“The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: All
There is little utility attempting to debate the "free" traders. It is their wont to name call and not even bother to read our concerns about "free" trade vis-a-vis our national security.

A 2000 report "Finally! Chipmakers Applaud China's WTO Acceptance," Electronic News, Jan 10, 2000, Grant Robert Johnson reported that China agreed to WTO rules. Gone would be the "mandatory requirements that imported goods go through a Chinese agent or middleman" and more importantly gone too is this. "Access to China's domestic market [was] contingent upon a foreign partner's willingness to transfer advanced technologies and Intellectual Property (IP) to the Chinese partner."

Had China lived up to its WTO agreement and true free trade resulted many of us would have no complaints. It would be a good sign that the Chi-com masters were out and Chinese citizens truly were on their way to individual rights. Fact is, the Party members and princelings are the "capitalists."

Still the problems exist. Just plucking something out of the google fishing net I offer this from the Harvard China Review. It is about a panel assembled to discuss Sustaining China's Economic Growth

This panel addressed these issues

* How should the Chinese government promote FDI and protect foreign investors' property rights?

* How to ensure efficient transfer of technologies and management expertise?

* How can foreign enterprises achieve profits while managing the risks of investing in China?

* What actions should the government take to strengthen IP law enforcement?

* How can foreign firms preempt IP infringement and protect themselves?

You see, (actually, I guess "free" traders won't) my concern is about all these things especially our useful idiots worrying about how to "ensure efficient transfer of technologies and management expertise" to communists who have every intent of increasing the number of nuke missiles aimed at us, our forces, and our friends around the world. They make no secret of their feeeeeeeeeeeelings.

These same useful idiots put their intellectual property (IP) in country and fret that the Chinese are stealing it.

I think I am beginning to understand how Lenin came up with "useful idiot." Useful to the communist, idiot is self-explanatory.

126 posted on 03/19/2004 8:04:18 AM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (Benedict Arnold was a hero for both sides in the same war, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw
"Free" trade, as espoused by these nitwits (and Bushbots, who usually just don't know ANYTHING) and Limbaugh, the WSJ, and Limbaugh's moron replacements, Williams and HedgeHead...

Is China's better warfare against the USA. The PRC cannot win a military confrontation; but they won't have to in 25 years.
133 posted on 03/19/2004 3:28:42 PM PST by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson