And, "Why do the nations believe a vain thing?"
Right or wrong isn't the issue.
We are talking about those the author refers to as fundamentalists, not to whoever 'really' is a fundamentalist.
Any opinion you have of the article or of the arthor is flawed if you fail to understand what he means by the term fundamentalist.
So9
It doesn't take more than a scan of this article to beg to differ. My opinion is that the use of the word "fundamentalist" as a perjorative is meaningless at best, or graver, that the author mistakes being given to belief (even true belief) over what we may "purely" reason out is an evil.
"We walk by faith, not by sight."