[balrog666]

Yep. And he was also a deeply committed Christian who loved and believed the Bible:

Um, no, he didn't. He did his own research from other ancient sources.

EXACTLY the kind of person this writer says is too stupid and ignorant to understand "reason."

Again, no. The author attacks those fundamentalists whose minds are closed to evidence, logic, and reason. Exactly the opposite of Newton.

[Skooz]

Um, yeah. he did. He was a distinguished biblical scholar. He never hid the fact that he believed the Bible to be the Word of God. He was, in every way, a Christian fundamentalist.

The author attacks those fundamentalists whose minds are closed to evidence, logic, and reason.

The author's premise is that ALL fundamentalists' "minds are closed to evidence, logic, and reason."

That would include such morons as Pascal, Copernicus, Dostoevsky, and, yes, Newton. Along with many, many others. These men would have to speak baby language for the author of this hit-piece to understand them.