[Virginia-American]

I think that in 100 years, if we are still here, the theory of evolution, will be considered an archaic theory of the 20th century. There is so little proof of any of it It goes against the one of the fundamental laws of physics, that is all matter tends toward disorder

Isn't the tendency toward disorder violated by life itself? A living organism maintains a non-equlibrium order; but as soon as it dies, it starts to lose that order and tends to disorder.

My point being, why does the 2nd law (at least in anti-evo circles) only apply to evolution; doesn't every living thing violate it?

(Of course neither one violates the 2nd law; and I know why)

[js1138]

My point being, why does the 2nd law (at least in anti-evo circles) only apply to evolution; doesn't every living thing violate it?

I've often intended to post this question myself, but the supply of peole stupid enough to argue second law is, alas dwindling. All the easy targets committed FReepercide last year.