Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CVW-7 Completes History-Making Missile Shoot
Navy Newsstand ^ | 3/17/2004 11:17:00 AM | Tracey Goff

Posted on 03/17/2004 11:46:39 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

USS GEORGE WASHINGTON, At Sea (NNS) -- Launching from USS George Washington's (CVN 73) flight deck on the afternoon of Feb. 25, aircraft from Carrier Air Wing (CVW) 7 fired 17 live missiles onto a range over the Arabian Sea in two separate waves.

The history-making missile exercise took place during a routine deployment for the George Washington Strike Group, deployed in support of Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom.

The ordnance was delivered by Fighter Squadrons (VF) 11 and 143 flying F-14B Tomcats, and Strike Fighter Squadrons (VFA) 131 and 136 in F/A-18C Hornets. Clearing the way for the fighter jets were the E2-C Hawkeye pilots of Airborne Early Warning Squadron (VAW) 121 and Sea Control Squadron (VS) 31 in the S-3B Viking.

Each squadron had its own responsibility to ensure a safe and successful exercise. A total of four F-14s and four F/A-18s left the ship in two separate waves on what may be one of the last live missile exercises for the F-14 Tomcat, which proved it could still deliver a lethal blow to enemy targets.

“The theory was to prove that even though the Phoenix has been in the inventory for more than two decades, they are still capable of projecting power and showing that they remain a very viable option in the air-to-air regime,” said Lt.j.g. Matt Tallyn of VF-143 "Pukin' Dogs.”

The Hornets provided the targets. “We dropped two of the three tactical air launch decoys, or TALDs,” said Lt. Brian Larmon of VFA-131 "Wildcats." “It’s a type of ordnance that glides. It simulates the profile of an aircraft we would be shooting at. It can be set up to turn or go straight. We can pick it up on radar and shoot it.”

Once the Hornets dropped the TALDs, it was time for history to be made. The Tomcats and the Hornets fired their missiles: a total of 16 Phoenix missiles from the Tomcats and one Sparrow from the Hornets.

“It’s very rare that you’ll see eight Phoenix missiles shot off at the same time,” said Tallyn, a radar intercept officer in the second wave of aircraft. “They all worked perfectly, exactly as they were designed. We were excited and thrilled that we were able to go out there and prove that the system is fully functional, and get eight picture-perfect missile shoots. That’s as much as you can ask from a missile shoot.”

VF-11 "Red Ripper" Lt. Garrett Shook agreed. “It was a once-in-a-career opportunity for me, because we shot two at a time, which is pretty rare. In one hour, I doubled the number of missiles I’ve shot in my career.”

Lt. j.g. Mike Manicchia of VFA-136 got the rush of shooting the Sparrow. “It’s pretty out of the ordinary. We get to drop plenty of bombs at practice targets, but not fire missiles. That’s something we never do. Most guys might get to shoot one missile on their first sea tour, so this is a big deal.”

Working out the intricacies of a tactical exercise of this magnitude does not happen overnight. Lt. Mike Burks, the air-to-air weapons training officer from VF-11 who planned the missile exercise, said it was only through a culmination of efforts that this mission was a success.

“It was about a three-week process from start to finish,” he said. “It required the coordination of assets from all the squadrons in the air wing, as well as reserving both the air space and the sea space for the missile exercise."

Once the range was clear, it was time to let the beasts off the ship, or in this case, the Tomcats, the Hornets, the Sparrow and the Phoenix.

“The Hawkeyes and the Vikings were out there about three hours before the exercise began, clearing the space and establishing a good picture for all of us back here so we could start to build a game plan,” said Burks. “By the time the missile shoot was launched, we had a very good idea of what the sea space and air space looked like, so we didn’t encounter problems with range foulers.”

“We provide overall safety and a digital picture of what the battle space looks like,” said VAW-121's Air Control Officer, Lt. Chris Barker. “We paint a picture of the area with our over-the-horizon radar.”

This technology is used to make sure the area is clear of any civilian traffic, or range foulers, which could slow down or halt the exercise. “We ensured there were no commercial airliners or any ships that are non-military, such as cargo ships and oil tankers, in the area of the missile exercise,” Barker said. “If there are, we then provide steering courses for the S-3s to relay to the ships.”

The VS-31 "Topcats" then used their aircraft’s unique ability to fly low and slow as a means of contacting ships straying into the reserved sea space. “We are in charge of range clearance,” said Lt.j.g. Brad Beall, a naval flight officer for the "Topcats." "We call them on a maritime common frequency to let them know they are in a military live fire exercise. We ask them to alter their course and get them out of danger.”

But the aviators are quick to mention they couldn’t do it without the help of other ship and squadron personnel. The squadron's ordnance personnel got a unique opportunity to use the skills they've trained so hard to hone. “They get to load live ordnance that they don’t usually get to see,” said Manicchia.

“There are always a lot of people that go and really make it work," Tallyn said. "We tell them this is what you do all the hard work for; this is why it’s so important to keep doing it. We’re just the ones who pull the trigger.”

Once all the aircraft returned to the ship, the reality of the accomplishment set in. “You really only get one opportunity to do this,” said Burks. “Making sure all the players know their role is the number one key to a good missile exercise. It’s a matter of briefing everybody and making sure that all the players know their responsibilities and also all the back-up plans so if we need to move to a back-up plan, it’s smooth and efficient, and people aren’t having to ask a lot of questions.”

Shook backed Burks up. “For a missile exercise, it went real smooth. The coordination, the planning and the cooperation between squadrons all went smooth enough to get the missiles off on the first try.

“When we do a missile exercise from the beach, we’ll probably fly the missiles without shooting them at least once. We’ll practice once, then go out and shoot it. We’d never flown the missiles before. We’d never practiced the scenario. We just briefed it, and then went out and did it. It was real successful.”

For related news, visit the USS George Washington (CVN 73) Navy NewsStand page at www.news.navy.mil/local/cvn73.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: fleetdefender; hornets; miltech; phoenix; pukindogs; tomcats; usn; ussgeorgewashington; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: quietolong
That's not what they told me in AO school.

It wasn't my understanding, either. What did they tell you at AO school?

21 posted on 03/18/2004 7:17:24 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Your ultraconservativen click-gorilla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: quietolong
Look at the AIM9 from A-R (think that’s the latest)

Awhile back (might be as many as two years now) they had a 50th anniversary celebration for the 'winder and invited everybody who had ever fired one either on the range or in combat. I never did check back in and find out how many people they got, but it must have been a bunch. A 50 year old missile...whodathunkit?

22 posted on 03/18/2004 7:22:23 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Your ultraconservativen click-gorilla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity; Pukin Dog; ballplayer

Go get 'em Pukin' Dogs!
23 posted on 03/18/2004 7:27:48 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Your ultraconservativen click-gorilla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
just getting ready for the taiwan straits meethinks...
24 posted on 03/18/2004 7:30:12 AM PST by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Hey, thanks for the ping.

Somethings in the Navy never change. After anything cool happens, the NFOs all rush to give the interviews so that its not possible to forget that they were there too. It is a long standing joke among flyers.

A truthful interview with a Tomcat crew would go something like this:

NFO: After the pilot got a good catshot, I told him to steer that-a-way, then he got into a combat-spread formation, at which time I asked him to light up a target. After I gave the pilot range and bearing info (that he could already see from his own instruments) I suggested that he go boresight on threat1, although he had already done so.

NFO: Although the HUD told the pilot when to shoot, I figured I would chime in and yell SHOOT! myself, so I could be part of the action. After the pilot called Fox3, he pitch up and rolled inverted to get a bounce on threat1. Me? Oh, I held on to my G-handle, and checked fuel state so I could suggest how long we could stay in burner.

NFO: After a good kill, the pilot flew to Marshall, after I gave him directions. Then the pilot stacked down to an OK-3, while I called out altitude and speed, even though the pilot could see that information in the HUD, I like to feel like I had something to do with it too, you know?

NFO: While the pilot reported any discrepancies with the aircraft to the plane captain, I found you interviewer guys so I could tell you about our cool mission today.

Pilot: Unless you got a slider in your pocket, get that microphone out of my face.
25 posted on 03/18/2004 7:46:33 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
LOL!

Two things:
Is NFO a slang term (for, say Non-Flying Officer) because I thought those guys were called RIOs? Also, I've heard that the WSOs in the Strike Eagle have a lot more to do than the Tomcat backseaters. True, or just WSO propaganda?

Unless you got a slider in your pocket,

Translation?

26 posted on 03/18/2004 7:57:20 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Your ultraconservativen click-gorilla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
If you want to talk about age, the Sidewinder and Sparrow II are a lot older and also still in use.

The best thing about the Phoenix is that it is a "Fire and forget" missle. A single F-14 can fire four Phoenix at four different targets and then turn on other targets with any one of several other weapons. Even guns.

The F-14 / Phoenix is a hell of a weapon system.

27 posted on 03/18/2004 7:59:44 AM PST by Jack of Diamonds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Slider = Cheeseburger

WSO's have much more to do than RIO's because they have to keep reminding the pilot to keep the wings level.

Actually, it was true until the Tomcat got the ground mission. The WSO is busy designating targets, handling ECM and navigation. Now that the Bombcat drops JDAMs, the RIO (now NFO) has a lot more to do than shutup and hold on.
28 posted on 03/18/2004 8:07:25 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
see 15
29 posted on 03/18/2004 9:05:02 AM PST by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jack of Diamonds
But thanks to the now V.P. No more are being made

F-14D Tomcat vs. F/18 E/F Super Hornet
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/595147/posts

The Carrier Myth
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/577009/posts

see 4



30 posted on 03/18/2004 9:09:45 AM PST by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
Don’t know. but I have a bunch laying around too.
31 posted on 03/18/2004 9:11:40 AM PST by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jack of Diamonds
If you want to talk about age, the Sidewinder and Sparrow II are a lot older and also still in use.

Yeah, on Halloween weekend in '02, they held the 50th anniversary celebration for the Sidewinder at China Lake.

What are they up to on that now, the X model?

The best thing about the Phoenix is that it is a "Fire and forget" missle. A single F-14 can fire four Phoenix at four different targets and then turn on other targets with any one of several other weapons. Even guns.

Yeah, the Air Force should have bought the Phoenix for use with the F-15. Imagine the deterrance value if the Warsaw Pact had known that the kill zone for their planes in a conventional war would extend for 120 miles East of the West German border. Just an excellent weapon. Anybody know why we wingnuts passed on it?

32 posted on 03/18/2004 10:22:17 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Caring about the Final Four for the first time ever. Go Air Force!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
WSO's have much more to do than RIO's because they have to keep reminding the pilot to keep the wings level.

In the name of all that is John Boyd-like, take that back! Freakin' squids! :-)

And, what's NFO stand for?

33 posted on 03/18/2004 10:35:54 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Caring about the Final Four for the first time ever. Go Air Force!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
NFO = Naval Flight Officer.

Others include:
Not Flying Officially
Not Following Orders
Need Flying Options
Nice Figure Oprah
Never Flew On (but rode in)
No Flight Opportunity

It goes on and on.
34 posted on 03/18/2004 10:51:55 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
The F-15 wing root creates a two very strong vortexes (spinning air) under the airframe along the long axis. This vortex tends to twist weapons held on the underbelly to the point of ripping from the airplane in flight. Any weapon with fins has to be carried either very tight to the body or out on the wings.

The Phoenix is too heavy to be carried on an F-15 wing pod, and the longitudinal fins would spin the missile right off the aircraft in flight. Not good.
35 posted on 03/18/2004 10:56:50 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Yep, Putin's been a day late and a dollar short since he took office. The only reason he gets any respect is because he'll shoot anybody who doesn't, then go after their family,
in the finest Russian tradition.
36 posted on 03/18/2004 3:00:45 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (All the good taglines are taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Thank you very much for the info. So, AMRAAM is sort of a smaller Air Force Phoenix?
37 posted on 03/18/2004 3:18:46 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Caring about the Final Four for the first time ever. Go Air Force!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
The AMRAAM or AIM-120 or 'slammer' is used by all the flying services and almost all of the NATO allies. The Tomcat was late to get the slammer, but the F-14D supports it. Slammer range is only a third of Phoenix range. The Phoenix is a HUGE missile. It is the reason that the Tomcat was built as big as a house. You don't need so much airplane to carry 6 slammers, but there is only one airframe that can take 6 Phoenix missiles for a ride.
38 posted on 03/18/2004 3:27:37 PM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Right, that's what I figured, and I knew that was the reason the Tomcat is built about as big as a B-25. I just figure that at least part of the motivation for the slammer is to give the Eagle jockeys the same fire-and-forget capability as the Phoenix, without the range.
39 posted on 03/18/2004 3:49:59 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Caring about the Final Four for the first time ever. Go Air Force!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
The F-18 Superhornet is supposed to replace the Tomcat. What a joke. Let's see the F-18 carry six Phoenix missiles. Hell, the "Superhornet" can't even go Mach 1 in clean condition below 10,000 feet. It would probably fall right out of the sky with 6 Phoenix on board.
40 posted on 03/18/2004 4:10:43 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (All the good taglines are taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson