Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPcapitalist
The northern states I spoke of previously, tu quoque boy, banned blacks from setting foot their outright.

So to what do you attribute the growth in the black population of Illinois between 1820 and 1860? At a time when the free black population of southern states like Louisiana, Mississippi, and Arkansas was declining?

64 posted on 03/23/2004 11:26:11 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Jefferson Davis - the first 'selected, not elected' president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
So to what do you attribute the growth in the black population of Illinois between 1820 and 1860?

Births to blacks already there plus the successful movement of blacks there in violation of the state's laws. In a similar pattern, it is currently illegal for people to immigrate into the United States without going through customs. Even so, the illegal mexican population here grows by several million every decade.

At a time when the free black population of southern states like Louisiana, Mississippi, and Arkansas was declining?

A quick comparison from 1850 to 1860 indicates the states of Maryland (where almost half of the black population was free), Virginia, Tennessee, South Carolina, North Carolina, Missouri, Kentucky, and Delaware ALL had net gains in the number of free blacks over the decade. Florida remained the same. You are also incorrect about Louisiana, which went from 17,462 to 18,647.

65 posted on 03/23/2004 12:28:05 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson