Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George Bush's secret army (Why Democrats Hate, and Fear, Home Schooled Kids)
Economist ^ | March 17th 2004 | Economist

Posted on 03/17/2004 6:38:11 AM PST by gobucks

A revolution is happening in American education. As it grows in size, it should frighten teachers everywhere.

Just how bad are American schools? And how deeply do conservative Americans distrust their government? One answer to both these questions is provided by the growth of home-schooling. As many as 2m American students—one in 25—may now be being taught at home.

The growth of home-schooling is all the more remarkable when you consider two facts. The first is the commitment of the parents. They give up not just a free public education, but also often the chance of a second income as well, because one parent (usually the mother) has to stay at home to educate the children.

The Department of Education highlights the results of its survey: “Homeschooling in the United States: 1999”. See also the Home School Legal Defense Association.

The next is that the practice challenges most of the assumptions behind public education. For most of the past 150 years, compulsory mass education has been the hallmark of a civilised society. Sociologists such as Max Weber have hailed the state's domination of education as a natural corollary of “modernisation”. Yet in the most advanced country on the planet (on many measures), more than 2m parents insist that education ought to be the work of the family. How has this come about?

Faith's imperatives

The 2m figure comes from the Home School Legal Defence Association. The most recent (1999) survey by the Department of Education put the number at only 850,000. The chances are that the HSLDA is closer to the truth. Rod Paige, the education secretary, uses its figure in his speeches, and, although home-schoolers tend to refuse to answer government surveys, a wealth of anecdotal evidence suggests that home-schooling is on the rise.

The market for teaching materials and supplies for home-schoolers is worth at least $850m a year. More than three-quarters of universities now have policies for dealing with home-schooled children. Support networks have sprung up in hundreds of towns and cities across the country to allow parents to do everything from establishing science labs to forming sports teams and defending their rights and reputation. When J.C. Penney started selling a T-shirt in 2001 that featured “Home Skooled” with a picture of a trailer home, the store faced so many complaints that it withdrew the item from sale.

Home-schooling is a fairly recent phenomenon. When Ronald Reagan came to power, in 1981, it was illegal for parents to teach their own children in most states. Today it is a legal right in all 50 states. Twenty-eight states require home-schooled children to undergo some kind of official evaluation, either by taking standardised tests or submitting a portfolio of work. Thirteen states simply require parents to inform officials that they are going to teach their children at home. In Texas, a parent doesn't have to tell anyone anything.

The main reason why legal restrictions on home-schooling have been swept away across so much of America is the power of the Christian right. Not all home-schoolers, of course, are religious conservatives. One of the first advocates of home-schooling, John Holt, was a left-winger who regarded schools as instruments of the bureaucratic-industrial complex. A lively subdivision of the home-school movement, called “unschooling”, argues that children should more or less be left to educate themselves. And the number of black home-schoolers is growing rapidly.

Yet the Praetorian Guard of the home-schooling movement are social conservatives. They turned to home-schooling in the 1970s in response to what they saw as the school system's lurch to the secular left—and they still provide most of the movement's political muscle on Capitol Hill. Senator Rick Santorum home-schools his children—or, rather, his wife does. Another Republican home-schooler, Congresswoman Marilyn Musgrave, sponsored a bill to clear up various legal confusions about grants and scholarships for home-schooled children.

George Bush has tried hard to keep home-schoolers on his side. During the 2000 campaign, he said: “In Texas we view home-schooling as something to be respected and something to be protected. Respected for the energy and commitment of loving mothers and loving fathers. Protected from the interference of government.” As president, he has held several receptions for home-schooled children in the White House.

Just as the teachers' unions provide so many of the Democrats' volunteers, home-schoolers are important Republican foot-soldiers. According to the HSLDA, 76% of home-schooled young people aged 18-24 vote in elections, compared with 29% in that age group in the general population. Home-schoolers are also significantly more likely to contribute to political campaigns and to work for candidates—normally Republican ones.



An education that works

So there is certainly an ideological edge to many home-schoolers. But do not be misled. First, this is a bottom-up movement with parents of whatever political stripe making individual decisions to withdraw their children (rather than following orders from higher up). Second, the movement has a utilitarian edge. Home-schoolers simply believe that they can offer their children better education at home.

One-to-one tuition, goes the argument, enables children to go at their own pace, rather than at a pace set for the convenience of teaching unions. And children can be taught “proper” subjects based on the Judeo-Christian tradition of learning, rather than politically correct flimflam. Some home-schoolers favour the classical notion of the trivium, with its three stages of grammar, dialectic and rhetoric (which requires children to learn Greek and Latin).

This sounds backward-looking, but home-schoolers claim that technology is on their side. The internet is making it ever easier to teach people at home, ever more teaching materials are available, and virtual communities now exist that allow home-schoolers to swap information.

The other factor working in home-schooling's favour is its own success. Many parents have been nervous about home-schooled children being isolated. With almost every town in America now boasting its own home-schooling network, that worry declines. Home-schooled children can play baseball with other home-schooled children; they can go on school trips; and so on.

What about academic standards? The home-schooling network buzzes with good news: a family with three home-schooled children at Harvard; a home-schooler with a bestselling novel; first, second and third place in the 2000 National Spelling Bee; a first university for home-schooled children (see article). Systematic evidence is more difficult to find.

There are certainly signs that home-schoolers are thriving. One recent survey by the HSLDA showed that three-quarters of home-educated adults aged 18-24 have taken college-level courses compared with 46% of the general population. But this is hardly conclusive. Home-schoolers do not have to report bad results. Moreover, home-schoolers may simply come from the more educated part of the population.

Yet these arguments point to change in the way the debate is unfolding. It is no longer about whether home-schooled children are losing out, but whether they are doing unfairly well. “Maybe we should subcontract all of public education to home-schoolers,” Bill Bennett, Mr Reagan's education secretary, once wondered mischievously. That looks unlikely. But America's home-schoolers represent an assault on public education that teachers everywhere should pay attention to.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: fearfuldems; homeschool; homeschoollist; hslda; voting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-214 next last
To: GingisK
Honestly, I wonder if the article is a leftist article being used as leftist bait .... sort of 'wake up, we're in danger' disguised as a glowing review.

I'm not sure. I don't know enough about the Economist.
181 posted on 03/17/2004 1:30:27 PM PST by gobucks (http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Poser
Thanks. I'm finding more and more that FR has an incredible base of support for this movement.
182 posted on 03/17/2004 1:35:21 PM PST by gobucks (http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: gobucks
It's a terrific state, except for the lack of employment opportunities and proximity to Arkansas :-).
183 posted on 03/17/2004 1:37:10 PM PST by Tax-chick (Donate to FRIENDS OF SCOUTING and ruin a liberal's day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
It couldn't be K12 if it's not good -- K12 is *great*! :) :) My K son and I have been having a wonderful time this morning on the Monticello website, after doing a lesson on Thomas Jefferson.

3rd grade history is awesome too -- Renaissance, Reformation, etc.

Glad you are having a good time in your homeschooling adventure! :)
184 posted on 03/17/2004 1:42:24 PM PST by GOPrincess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
As I've said several times, it's too bad you're so far away! My two older girls are in Girl Scouts, but we'd really prefer "Girl Cubs"! Our Cub Scout Pack back in Oklahoma had an unofficial Girls' Auxiliary, but they can't earn awards like the boys, so it's not as much fun.
185 posted on 03/17/2004 1:47:47 PM PST by Tax-chick (Donate to FRIENDS OF SCOUTING and ruin a liberal's day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: GOPrincess
Do you pay for K12 or are you in one of the states where it is a virtual elementary? My Great nephew is learning through Ohio Virtual Elementary, which is K12. He is doing great and my Nephew and Niece-in-law love it too.

It's all great isn't it? We are making soda bread in about 10 minutes and we've been learning "I'm Looking over a Four Leaf Clover" all afternoon!
186 posted on 03/17/2004 1:50:38 PM PST by netmilsmom (Jonathansmommie's daughter was born 3-11-04, God Bless her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
I need to move!
187 posted on 03/17/2004 1:51:57 PM PST by netmilsmom (Jonathansmommie's daughter was born 3-11-04, God Bless her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Good time for it ... interest rates down again!

Do you have St. Patrick's Prayer? Look at www.domestic-church.com, in the section on Saints.
188 posted on 03/17/2004 1:59:11 PM PST by Tax-chick (Donate to FRIENDS OF SCOUTING and ruin a liberal's day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: gobucks
Just how bad are American schools?

It's so bad that California high schools want to waive algebra requirements so that their students can graduate.

-PJ

189 posted on 03/17/2004 2:04:07 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
We're in the CA at San Diego Virtual Academy...it's gone really well, the curriculum is outstanding, head and shoulders above what's happening in bricks & mortar schools. (PS Our teacher is a sweetheart, very supportive and non-intrusive. The Charter is a great way for parents who might otherwise be nervous about making the homeschool leap to get their toes wet, and I love that my tax dollars are paying for it!) Just finished a 3rd grade lesson on the Taj Mahal...but we're doing "Irish" stuff today too! I got out the shamrock and "spring flower" cookie cutters and we're about to make some cutout cookies. I rarely had time for cutout cookies when my children were all in school, they were too busy with homework when they got home! It's amazing how much less time it takes homeschooling, isn't it?
190 posted on 03/17/2004 2:16:57 PM PST by GOPrincess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
My 10th grader is the only one of my children left in public school, and she said the CA H.S. exit exam she took yesterday was so easy, her 3rd grade sister could have taken it for her and she'd still graduate.

And yet they keep pushing back the dates when students who can't pass the test will be held back from graduation, waive algebra, etc. I could go on and on about the sad state of the schools, and we're in a "nice" neighborhood. Oldest daughter is studying for next month's Advanced Placement exam in European History independently as the teacher was so awful...it wasn't worth the extra points in her GPA to take the class after suffering through a year with him! She's still there as I haven't felt equipped to tackle Honors Chemistry, calculus & trig, Spanish 3, etc., but I'm hoping to develop other options for my younger children...possibly the H.S. curriculum www.K12.com is developing, as we've been so pleased with it this year.
191 posted on 03/17/2004 2:21:06 PM PST by GOPrincess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: dd5339
For what it's worth the Trivium method is looking like the choice for us.

We searched long and hard and did a couple of years of research before settling on the Trivium method. Yes, the boys learn Latin as part of their schooling, and it's far from "backward-looking." Not only do they study how the Greco-Roman society influenced our Founding Fathers; they also recognize the root of many English words, which helps them decipher meaning based on the Latin they already know. (Example: one of this week's spelling words for my 5th grader is "culpable." He already knows that in Latin culpa means "fault." Easy as pie.)

For people looking into home schooling I'd highly recommend, "A Well Trained Mind," (Jessie Wise and Susan Wise Bauer). It lays out the Trivium method in a very concise, well thought out format.

I second that recommendation. For those investigating homeschooling and especially the Trivium, they lay out not only theory but also specific suggestions for study and curriculum.

We don't follow any specific curriculum but have instead built our own based on what we deemed to be the best in each area. Our kids are thriving, brilliant, fun, funny, well-behaved, personable, and great people to be around. I love homeschooling.

(Aside: We visited a church last week and the boys sat quietly and mannerly through the entire service...the other children left for children's church, but as we were just visiting, they wanted to stay with us. They were the only kids left in the service. An hour later, literally dozens of people came up and shook their hands and told them how unusually well-behaved they were. One of the crowd asked where they were going to school, since we just moved to this town. They answered, "We homeschool." One lady said, "Well, that explains everything.")

192 posted on 03/17/2004 2:21:42 PM PST by shezza (Got Ultrakonservativen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Utter complete fantastic unreality. Thanks for the link.
193 posted on 03/17/2004 2:34:58 PM PST by gobucks (http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: GOPrincess
The schools are so bad that it now takes 12 years to teach 9 years of schooling. The first year of college is becoming remedial high school.

-PJ

194 posted on 03/17/2004 2:41:43 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
And I pray everyday in thanks for the FReepers who helped convince my hubby that this is right!!!

I remember you!

Super Duper.

Like any other thing, some days are diamonds and some days are stones. But, more are diamonds, as are those dear childern who are getting the best gifts their parents can give them. Time and love.

195 posted on 03/17/2004 2:53:43 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TxBec
When I pulled my kids out in 2001, I was told an attendance officer would come by for a visit (just a formality, they said)....it's 2004 and haven't seen him yet.

Obligatory usual advice: Join HSLDA.

196 posted on 03/17/2004 2:56:48 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Thank you so much Don-o! So far days have been diamonds, with maybe a couple of CZs thrown in!
197 posted on 03/17/2004 3:07:29 PM PST by netmilsmom (Jonathansmommie's daughter was born 3-11-04, God Bless her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Thank you so much Don-o! So far days have been diamonds, with maybe a couple of CZs thrown in!

Let me add some mews from Little House on Unaka (Avenue) St Athanasius Academy.

Ben (13) is now doing high school work, through Seton, which has on line support. He is to the point that he is directing his own education with minimal oversight; which is good, because Vanya (11) needs a lot of attention.

Ben's piano studies are getting him into the classical composers; he earns an average of $60 a week by snow shoveling, yard work, and helping a man in the neighborhood who has built a brick oven for old world style bread baking.

We found a teacher who formed a choir for homeschoolers, and Vanya is in that. On choir day, he also goes to the local university, where he is doing some work on his auditory processing challenges. (Russian orphan born with cleft palate which can jumble up the brain as well.)

Both boys help serve my 89 year old blind father-in-law, who is graduallly declining into dementia.

Yesterday, on his own initiative, Ben began clearing a jungle that had grown in our back yard.

Neither boy has ever spent a day in the institution. I know that Ben would be bored, and Vanya packed off to "special" Ed. Instead, we have two bright, pleasant and obedient boys, who are becoming good men.

My buttons pop off my shirt when the boys intereact with adults, who invaribly comment on what great kids they are.

That is the payback for the sacrifices we make. Worth it.

198 posted on 03/17/2004 3:36:03 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: don-o
mews?

doh!
199 posted on 03/17/2004 3:37:06 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Well God Bless you my FRiend!!! What a great job you have done! Too bad your boys aren't a little younger or my girls a little older. They could do each other well.

How did you name your school? Does Seton cost anymore than the initial payment? Do you have to buy books or consumable? I had heard that we must return the stuff every year.

We were talking about doing Switched on Schoolroom. All my daughter's penmanship is copying Baltimore Cathechism!!!
200 posted on 03/17/2004 4:10:13 PM PST by netmilsmom (Jonathansmommie's daughter was born 3-11-04, God Bless her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson