Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiramAbiff
"Criticism of Bush is support for Terrorism."

No it's not.

Criticism of any polititian is healthy and should be encouraged no matter what their political flavor.

Are you seriously saying that you would support Bush no matter what he did or suggested?
6 posted on 03/17/2004 12:00:54 AM PST by Dave Elias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Dave Elias
Stern took a 180 degree turn from his support of Bush's war on terrorism when he revealed that he had read Al Franken's latest book over this last Christmas vacation period. He bought into every "lie" that Al Franken wrote, and spread that misinformation as if it was his own. He even badgered one of his E! directors, Scott De Pace, to read the book because Scott was one of the few in Stern's den of inequity who would vocally support Bush and the Republican party.

This was obviously at least a month before Justin Timberlake exposed Janet Jackson's right breast to an unsuspecting Super Bowl XXXVIII audience.

His latest over-reaction to the FCC and the Bush administration has been in the works for longer than I suspect, and when he revealed that another supporter of Bush on his show, "Crazy Cabbie", had turn on Bush due to the false reports that families who lost loved ones during 9/11 were upset that Bush used images from 9/11 to begin his campaign commercials, Stern lost his mind. Stern even suggested that John Kerry or the Democrat Party use a voice over Bush's own commercial to tell the public that Bush was using a "painful" memory for political gains. This was apparently the "same" Stern that once said Americans should be reminded every day what the terrorists had done to the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

So, even if Stern has a "right" to express his opposition to a political administration, "we" should have a right to oppose that view and question the person behind the opposition. Stern gave nothing to challenge his "latest" political opinion when he became so anti-Bush these past few months that I finally came to my senses and chose NOT to listen to a repeat of lies spread by the likes of Al Franken and George Soros. I can only imagine how pissed off liberals were listening to Stern support Bush's war on terrorism in days past, because like vintage Stern, he gives little say to opposing views.

I'm fed up with Stern, and I am finding that we've got a lot more sensible radio personalities out there who actually work within the bounds of decency.

Boycott Stern!

7 posted on 03/17/2004 1:35:21 AM PST by entheos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Dave Elias
I heard that driving SUV's was support for Terrorism.

19 posted on 03/17/2004 5:35:57 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Bury Kerry in 04! Down with Lenin Loving Lemmings....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Dave Elias
"Are you seriously saying that you would support Bush no matter what he did or suggested?"

No, I criticize Bush all the time on his reckless, politically-motivated immigration policy and his insane liberal spending policies. Stern on the other is spreading lies and slander about the Commander in Cheif in a time of War thereby undercutting the War on Terrorism and giving aid to Terrorists.

Stern has no "right" to be heard. Taking away his access to the public airwaves does not violate his freedom of speech - he can spew whatever filth he wants to spew from a soapbox on the corner. He is doing damage to this country and our Freedoms. Taking the megaphone of the public airwaves away from Stern is legal, righteous and necessary if we want to defeat terrorism and save this country.
29 posted on 03/17/2004 7:59:35 AM PST by HiramAbiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson