How?
Clear Channel said that Stern violated their "Responsible Broadcasting Initiative", whatever that is. I'm ass-u-me-ing that they have a 'we say what you can say' clause in the contract, rather than give him full creative control. Otherwise, Stern could sue for full payment of the balance of the contract (4 years I believe) which he has not done. So, the lack of Howard whining about not getting paid, and the citing of some company initiative that Howard ignored lead me to believe Howard broke his contract.
http://www.clearchannel.com/documents/press_releases/20040226_Rad_Stern.pdf
He is doing so now, from what he has said. So, the lack of Howard whining about not getting paid, and the citing of some company initiative that Howard ignored lead me to believe Howard broke his contract.
Whining? No. Talking about it daily, Yes. Clear Channel is a political tool in this, in my opinion.