Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiteGuy
>Stern broke his contract, he should be yanked. It's really simple.

How?

Clear Channel said that Stern violated their "Responsible Broadcasting Initiative", whatever that is. I'm ass-u-me-ing that they have a 'we say what you can say' clause in the contract, rather than give him full creative control. Otherwise, Stern could sue for full payment of the balance of the contract (4 years I believe) which he has not done. So, the lack of Howard whining about not getting paid, and the citing of some company initiative that Howard ignored lead me to believe Howard broke his contract.

http://www.clearchannel.com/documents/press_releases/20040226_Rad_Stern.pdf

108 posted on 03/18/2004 7:08:43 AM PST by SouthMountainBilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: SouthMountainBilly
Stern could sue for full payment of the balance of the contract (4 years I believe) which he has not done.

He is doing so now, from what he has said. So, the lack of Howard whining about not getting paid, and the citing of some company initiative that Howard ignored lead me to believe Howard broke his contract.

Whining? No. Talking about it daily, Yes. Clear Channel is a political tool in this, in my opinion.

115 posted on 03/18/2004 1:53:22 PM PST by WhiteGuy (Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson