Posted on 03/16/2004 9:32:37 AM PST by Mr. Silverback
There is a white flag blowing in the breeze over the beautiful city of Madrid. Muslims, who once fought a bloody war to occupy much of Spain -- which they did for centuries, have now done it with a few bombs, an ominous portent indeed.
In THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS, Samuel Huntington wrote that there are three great religious blocks in the world: Eastern religion; the scattered nations of Islam; and Western civilization, influenced by the Judeo-Christian tradition, embodied in the United States and Europe. As we look at September 11 and its aftermath, we have to conclude that Huntington was right when he predicted that the clash between Islam and the West would be the great struggle of the twenty-first century.
But Huntington went on to say that Islam would win. I disputed that at the time, but given recent events in Europe, I'm beginning to wonder.
Spain is one of the two major European nations to support America's position in Iraq and the War on Terrorism. If, as it now appears, al Qaeda was responsible for bombing the trains in Madrid just days before the election, then al Qaeda has defeated Spain by giving the Socialists an upset victory over the center right party of Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar. Observers say the war issue brought about the surprise upset. The Prime Minister-elect, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zabatero, has promised to bring Spanish troops home from Iraq -- just what the demonstrators in the streets have been screaming for.
In bombing those trains, al Qaeda fired a warning shot at the West -- if you come after us, put troops in the Middle East, and try to destroy radical Islam, we will destroy you.
And so the Spanish and the rest of Europe have surrendered. They will allow the United States to fight this out alone, as Islam takes an ever larger hold, population-wise, in all European nations. One can see a progression in which Europe becomes neutralized and then falls under the influence of Islam. It may take a generation or two, but it is almost inevitable if the Spanish elections are any sign of European resolve. We find nations too comfortable -- or perhaps too decadent -- to fight for their own liberty.
There is a second ominous portent here: We can expect al Qaeda to attempt a major attack of the United States on the eve of our presidential elections this year to try to do the same thing to us that they did to the Spaniards.
Do we have the will and the resolve to continue to battle Islamist extremists? Our only defense is to deal with nations that are sponsoring terrorism -- the real reason we went into Iraq in the first place (weapons of mass destruction, I think, are secondary). We must, as Bernard Lewis, the great scholar of Islam at Princeton says, build a democratic structure in the Middle East that will bring about an end to the oppressive Islamic regimes.
The radicals know that modernity cannot be conquered in the free marketplace of ideas. It must be destroyed -- bin Laden has written this, as have others. Are we willing to let them have their way?
I'll speak for myself: The answer is, "No." If we really love our nation and the people around us, we will be willing to defend them. In fact, it is the greatest expression of Christian love to defend our neighbors against the threat to our way of life and, of course, our Christian faith.
Maybe, just maybe, what has happened in Spain will serve as a wake-up call, because September 11, you see, was not just an isolated event. We are in a real war.
If anyone wants on or off my BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
Yep. And Spain should have thought about that, not just in terms of Al-Qaida, but in terms of ETA. If you're the guy running ETA right now, are you looking at this and thinking, "Maybe if we pull off a big strike they'll finally make some real concessions on Basque autonomy." Of course, maybe they won't need to: Rambette pointed out just now that this is an appeasment government, maybe they'll pre-emptively appease the Basques.
Does anyone doubt that the Democratic party holds more than a few individuals that would resort to terrorism to get there party in power. Or for that matter I wouldn't doubt that there are at least a few conservatives who would do the same.
We've had domestic terror from both extreme ends of the political spectrum. The Klan did it in Birmingham in the 60s, the Weathermen and other types as well. If the government's allegations are true, Eric Rudolph has done the same, though not to swing an election. Then there's Kacynski and McVeigh, both left-looneys, though you won't get the press to say so. Please note: I would say that someone who commits a terrorist act is by definition not a conservative, but a genuine right-wing fanatic of some sort.
BTW, here's something interesting: On September 10th, 2001, the New York Times' did an interview with an unapologetic Weatherman terrorist who wrote a book about his heroic experiences. Of course, it not only didn't get much attention the next day, but thousands of copies of it were blasted to confetti by Osama's boys. I nearly burst a blood vessel when that Weatherman's smug face was on the front of the Chicago Tribune's Sunday magazine insert that weekend. I wanted to find him (and the editor) and kill them with my bare hands. I just couldn't believe they'd still run that piece.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.