Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hobbes1
The internationalists all agreed that Iraq was bad. Clinton needed a convenient country to bomb to distract the citizenry from his troubles at home so there was general agreement from professional Washington out to the Council on Foreign Relations that Saddam was a legit target for regime change/ nation building.

Because the Right, Bush's base, does not support nation building, the national security angle was stressed in order to gather support from Bush rightwing base.

But to believe there were no geopolitical goals is naive beyond 8th grade.

BTW, since Wolfowitz declaration that WMDs was the general reason, and there were no WMDs, why are we still there?
17 posted on 03/16/2004 8:11:34 AM PST by JohnGalt (What tale will serve me here among Mine angry and defrauded young? -- R. Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: JohnGalt
Poor Saddam. He was framed! Too bad we are finding this out now, before he is executed. If we had executed him first, being so innocent, maybe he could have been elevated to sainthood.
18 posted on 03/16/2004 8:23:31 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson