Skip to comments.
Democratic Flashback: Truman Compared Dewey to Hitler
Newsmax ^
| 3/14/04
| Limbacher
Posted on 03/14/2004 5:51:19 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
President Bush's decision to invoke the Sept. 11 attacks in a campaign commercial has Democrats livid. But when it comes to politicizing America's wars, Bush has nothing on Democratic icon Harry Truman, who actually demonized his opponent by comparing him to Adolf Hitler in campaign speeches.
The New York Times chronicled some of Truman's incendiary rhetoric in its Oct. 26, 1948 edition, in a report on a Truman campaign speech in Chicago against New York Republican Thomas Dewey.
"President Likens Dewey to Hitler as Facists' Tool," read the Times headline, followed by the subhead, "Dictatorship Stressed."
The Times headline writer continued, "Truman Tells Chicago Audience a Republican Victory Will Threaten U.S. Liberty - Says When Bigots, Profiteers Get Control of Country They Select 'Front Man' to Rule."
This from the hero of the party that goes ballistic today at the mere hint that a Republican is "questioning our patriotism."
TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1948; 911imagery; ads; dnc; gwb2004; harrytruman; hitler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Truman's minions also circulated a poem which read, "A horses tail is nice and gooey. Look underneath and there is Dewey." I'll bet no one else on this board can remember Truman or the little poem.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
3
posted on
03/14/2004 5:55:46 PM PST
by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Beware: My posts bite back.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This supports my impression that Truman was one of the most over-rated presidents ever. Whatever good he did in ending World War II and stopping the Communist advance in Korea was more than off-set by losing China and firing MacArthur, who had a sensible strategy to not only stop, but roll-back the Communist gains.
4
posted on
03/14/2004 5:56:18 PM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(crime would drop like a sprung trap-door if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings)
To: shrinkermd
5
posted on
03/14/2004 5:58:13 PM PST
by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Beware: My posts bite back.)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
No one should get offended by the characterization by the media of the Bush ads as offensive or as attack ads. Instead, you should expect it as a matter of course. He could run an ad praising his mother for raising him and his wife for reforming it and the media would attack it as an anti feminist ad. It's part of the dems plan to demonize everything Bush says or does and the media is complicit in supporting it. They will never point out that the criticism originated with groups funded by the dems. It's rather sickening.
6
posted on
03/14/2004 5:58:13 PM PST
by
Arkie2
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
No new tricks in the Dem playbook.
7
posted on
03/14/2004 6:09:15 PM PST
by
Brilliant
To: WinOne4TheGipper
Yep, the Dem playbook was written by FDR's Brain Trust and hasn't changed much in over 70 years. The same class warfare drivel, the same sympathy for dictatorships that hate us. While it is true that Truman took some stands against Commies in certain areas, he was never in favor of rolling them back and certainly was not concerned about their presence in our own government. It was less that he was pro-Commie than it was that he consistently underestimated their brutality. Until Truman was re-invented by Liberals in the 1970s, his Presidency was widely considered to be a failure. He was eligible to run again in 1952, but his popularity was so abysmal that he opted out rather than face certain defeat at the polls.
8
posted on
03/14/2004 6:20:06 PM PST
by
speedy
To: shrinkermd
Wow, grandpa, you've still got your memory! And you've still got your memory!
9
posted on
03/14/2004 6:24:04 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(All I ever wanted to know about Islam I learned on 9/11)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Dewey's biggest mistake was that mustache of his. It made him look like some kind of con artist, I always thought. I was a boy back then, too. I thought Truman was a jerk (a crooked haberdasher) but Dewey looked like some kind of city slicker trying to pose as Gregory Peck and doing a poor job of it.
10
posted on
03/14/2004 6:46:43 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: shrinkermd
A donkey's tail is nice and hairy, lift it up... it's John F'n' Kerry!
11
posted on
03/14/2004 6:50:52 PM PST
by
anonymous_user
(Politics is show business for ugly people.)
To: anonymous_user
A donkey's tail is nice and hairy, lift it up... it's John F'n' Kerry! Hey that is great. As I remember Brit Hume's grandfather worked for the Washington Post and did the review of Margaret Truman's piano recital. Hume gave a poor review and President Truman threatened to "punch him in the nose." At the time, this was shocking. I guess now it would be ordinary RAT conduct.
To: Cicero
I don't know. He looks like a Clark Gable without the charm.
To: Cicero
To: shrinkermd
President Truman threatened to "punch him in the nose." At the time, this was shocking.
I guess I'd threaten to punch someone in the nose who criticized my daughter's piano playing too. Well, unless she was over 18 and could punch them herself. :) Maybe it's more of a dad thing than a Rat thing?
It has been fun hearing about some of the dirty campaigns of yesteryear. You'd think "dirty politics" was invented this year by the way everyone is carrying on.
15
posted on
03/14/2004 7:15:21 PM PST
by
anonymous_user
(Politics is show business for ugly people.)
To: shrinkermd
The music critic who panned Margaret Truman's singing was Paul Hume, 1915-2001, who married in 1949 and had 4 children: Paul, Michael, Ann, and Peter. I don't remember what Who's Who has for Brit's parents or date of birth, and couldn't find anything useful with a Google search just now; he can't be Paul Hume's grandson but perhaps is related in some other way. I thought Brit was a nickname.
To: Verginius Rufus
"The music critic who panned Margaret Truman's singing was Paul Hume, 1915-2001, who married in 1949 and had 4 children: Paul, Michael, Ann, and Peter. I don't remember what Who's Who has for Brit's parents or date of birth, and couldn't find anything useful with a Google search just now; he can't be Paul Hume's grandson but perhaps is related in some other way. I thought Brit was a nickname. I don't know either, but if Paul Hume had children at 20 or 21 as did his children, Brit could be a grandson. I note that people in my generation married and had children much earlier: it was rare to wait till the age of 25 to start your family.
To: shrinkermd
I checked
Who's Who today for Brit Hume (full name: Alexander Britton Hume). He was born June 22, 1943, and his parents were George and Virginia Powell (Minnigerode) Hume. Paul Hume did not marry until 1949 and was only 27 years old when Brit was born.
Truman called Paul Hume "a frustrated old man" at the time of his panning Margaret's singing; at that time Paul Hume was 35 years old and President Truman was 66.
To: Verginius Rufus
So what is the relationship between Alexander Britton Hume and Truman's nemesis, Paul Hume?
To: shrinkermd
I don't know if Brit Hume and Paul Hume are related or not; until your post of a couple of days ago I had never heard the matter raised (and wasn't even aware that the music critic had the same last name as Brit's). Had you heard or read something to that effect? Brit was born in Washington, D.C.
Margaret Truman later turned to novel-writing, but I don't know if Paul Hume wrote any book reviews panning her writing.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson