How come Niederer's son has a different last name from his mother? Some discord in the family perhaps? What a shame.
Wonder how he would feel were he here today knowing that his 'mom' supports the very people who killed him and are trying to kill more Americans like him?
Her ex is a lucky man.
Wonder how he would feel were he here today knowing that his 'mom' supports the very people who killed him and are trying to kill more Americans like him?
The son is in a place where I believe he knows the truth about Nancy Lessin and Medea Benjamin's motives. They are trading on the sympathy the general public feels for our soldiers and their families.
And the left wing wackos like Medea, Lessin, Brian Becker and Leslie Cagan are sneaky. They realize they can't call our troops "baby killers" anymore, so they adapt to co-opt the good will the public feels towards the troops. However, I wish Sue Niederer saw the comments that flew around on the ANSWER, MFSO and CODEPINK populated boards before the public smacked them down and they found a new appreciation for the military. The two basic themes from the left wingers were that these people, the military, couldn't get jobs in the "real world" do they joined up. The other, absolutely disgusting attitude on the left was, "That's what they signed up for".
Some people do sign up for the military because of hardships, but that's not a reflection on their capabilities, but on a local or family situation. The vast majority in that situation do so to better themselves. The military certainly isn't the easy way out. And I wouldn't stand for any President that gives away any soldiers life away cheap. In fact, a lot of people feel that way, that's why we fire very expensive cruise missiles, expend $10,000 in ordnence to kill one enemy. Because the American people will gladly spend "obscene amounts" of treasure before we sacrifice a fellow citizen's life.
Funny how that's lost on the Washington Post and New York Times. Those were the people who'd cry about the "waste" of $10,000 in artillery barrage to kill one enemy. Well you're damn straight, it's a good way to protect something much more precious. Why do the WP, NYT and CBS always think the enemy is entitled to, no, has a right, to a fair chance to kill American soldiers?