Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
As a side note rabbit trail thing, I don't understand this hesitance in evolutionists to say that more complex is better. It is as if they are saying that bacteria are better than man because they are more survivable. So it appears I have to say complex instead of better inorder to be understood. Otherwise we are stuck with all of these multicelled organizms like sharks and man and dogs which are just less efficient side effects of evolution.
298 posted on 03/15/2004 12:30:28 PM PST by biblewonk (I must try to answer all bible questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]


To: biblewonk
I don't understand this hesitance in evolutionists to say that more complex is better.

Because "better" is a subjective term.

301 posted on 03/15/2004 12:34:52 PM PST by Junior (No animals were harmed in the making of this post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

To: biblewonk
Evolution isn't about better, or even about more complex. Evolution happens all the time in the world without significant increases in complexity.

But increases in complexity are possible, and when they result in reproductively fit organisms, they stick.

302 posted on 03/15/2004 12:35:13 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson