[biblewonk]

As a side note rabbit trail thing, I don't understand this hesitance in evolutionists to say that more complex is better. It is as if they are saying that bacteria are better than man because they are more survivable. So it appears I have to say complex instead of better inorder to be understood. Otherwise we are stuck with all of these multicelled organizms like sharks and man and dogs which are just less efficient side effects of evolution.

[Junior]

I don't understand this hesitance in evolutionists to say that more complex is better.

Because "better" is a subjective term.

[js1138]

Evolution isn't about better, or even about more complex. Evolution happens all the time in the world without significant increases in complexity.

But increases in complexity are possible, and when they result in reproductively fit organisms, they stick.