[nopardons]

I've read it and unlike like you, I understand it.

I'm not a neo-con and using it as pejorative, by the likes of you, is far funnier and more revealing, than you could ever imagine. LOL

[billbears]

I've read it and unlike like you, I understand it.

Apparently not, as you ridicule any stance other than that of the current administration. Matter of fact I've seen you use that statement on every document the Founders penned from the Declaration of Independence to the Federalist Papers. However, your stance on most, if not all, issues discussed come in direct conflict with the stances of these fine gentleman. You're like most politicians, pay lip service to the documents but ignore their intent. Are you sure you're not a Republican Senator?

I'm not a neo-con and using it as pejorative, by the likes of you, is far funnier and more revealing, than you could ever imagine. LOL

I think you just run back to name calling when you're backed into a corner. Dispute what Monroe stated as posted from the Monroe Doctrine. Can you do that sweety? Is it too much for you to provide evidence from the Monroe Doctrine to refute my stance? Here, I'll even help you out

It is only when our rights are invaded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparation for our defense.

That's about all you've got to stand on but I imagine in the twisted minds of liberal warhawks that would advocate this nation of states sending armed forces around the world 'spreading democracy' for no other reason than to state another nation's form of government somehow 'menaced' our own.

And FYI, you are by definition a neocon. You have argued support for FDR policies, armed conflict around the world even when it doesn't directly affect this nation of states, and big government policies signed by the current occupant of the Oval Office. I take back what I said earlier. You're not a Republican Senator, you're really Irving Kristol aren't you?