Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djf
How sad that the Supreme Court, charged with upholding the Constitution, should make headlines by changing course and finally starting to do so.

(By the way, sometimes one cannot be confronted by ALL hearsay witnesses... 'dying declarations' fall under that heading, too!)

41 posted on 03/13/2004 4:16:04 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Teacher317
What's even more odd is that everyone except the mushy middle joined in upholding the Constitution (Rehnquist and O'Connor concurred with the specific result, not the reasoning, and most certainly not the wholesale disallowing of unchallenged hearsay).

Methinks "dying declarations" would fall under the time-honored "unavailable" exception.

43 posted on 03/13/2004 4:52:00 AM PST by steveegg (You don't clean up 8 years of messes in 4, only to turn it over to Pigpen - W'04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson