To: djf
does that mean that a traffic camera must come into court to testify against you?
To: Forrestfire
No, but you have to admit, Scalia kicks serious ass.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
3 posted on
03/12/2004 8:14:34 PM PST by
section9
(Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "John Kerry: all John F., no Kennedy..." Click on my pic!)
To: Forrestfire; djf
I hate those cameras. The taxi drivers got it right in Taiwan, where they beat the ugly things into "dis-service" with baseball bats! LOL Also, the government there would put in fake ones, but the people all knew which were which ;)
To: Forrestfire
Not only that, the traffic camera has to be subject to a cross-examination.
20 posted on
03/12/2004 9:39:59 PM PST by
ontos-on
To: Forrestfire
there is in fact case law requiring the officer upon request to bring the acrual radar unit that was used into court. this can be useful in a jury trial. the officer will invariably call the thing a "device" or "instrument," while good defense counsel will call it a "machine," or, occasionally, "gadget."
28 posted on
03/12/2004 10:34:10 PM PST by
dep
(Ense Petit Placidam Sub Libertate Qvietem)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson