[Zack Attack]

Yes, he voted "no." But if he attended that meeting, his very attendance was part of a conspiracy. If he wanted nothing to do with it, he had a duty to inform authorities about a potential plot to kill senators.

Really, whether he voted "yes" or "no" would make no difference. The mere fact that he would even cast a vote on such a thing would seem to me to be giving credence to it. The only right thing he could have done would be to walk out and immediately contact authorities.

[doug from upland]

I agree that how he voted didn't really matter. I was responding to someone else's post. Just placing him at the scene means he engaged in conspiracy and committed a serious felony. Even if he was not there, as the leader, he had to know what was happening.