Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spunkets
Notice pro-life has been replaced with anti-abortion.

Actually, "pro-life" is used six times in the article and "anti-abortion" only three times. And the first person quoted in the article who was not an activist on either of the two sides is one who speaks favorably on the pro-life cause. I thought the article was pretty well balanced.
7 posted on 03/12/2004 10:35:11 AM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: drjimmy
"Actually, "pro-life" is used six times in the article and "anti-abortion" only three times. And the first person quoted in the article who was not an activist on either of the two sides is one who speaks favorably on the pro-life cause. I thought the article was pretty well balanced."

The journalist always used the term anti-abortion. Pro-life was only used, because it is the name of the Pro-Life Action League and one other time as part of a quote. The term anti-abortion was chosen by the baby killers, because they see offing troublesome kids as a right and theat's what they are promoting.

8 posted on 03/12/2004 10:45:39 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson