Skip to comments.
Campaign Word War Rages - "THE MOST CROOKED, YOU KNOW, LYING GROUP I'VE EVER SEEN"
CBSNews ^
| 3/12/04
Posted on 03/12/2004 6:55:36 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
If he sticks to his language, good!
Did he say the same thing about Clinton?
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
If he sticks to his language, good! Did he say the same thing about Clinton?
The Saddam Democrats Strike Again
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"I have no intention whatsoever of apologizing for my remarks," Kerry said during a Thursday news conference on the Senate side of the Capitol. "I think the Republicans need to start talking about the real issues before the country."
What the
*&^&*%&^@#$ is he talking about? We ARE the only ones talking about the REAL issues in America. He is just sad. Man!
4
posted on
03/12/2004 6:59:11 AM PST
by
writer33
(The U.S. Constitution defines a Conservative)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
don't apologize, just back up your statements or shut up.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This is so politically calculated (by Kerry) and the 'news media' is being used.
I wonder if Kerry set up his 'impromptu' press conf. in Washington BEFORE he made his "crooked, liars" remark?
6
posted on
03/12/2004 7:00:12 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
(KERRY KNEW HIS MIC WAS ON!!!!!!)
To: writer33
Yeah... if he apologizes he'll loose all the Dean voters. They'll go with Nader or just stay home. He has to stay negative to keep them.
7
posted on
03/12/2004 7:00:23 AM PST
by
kjam22
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry rejected Republican demands that he apologize for calling his GOP critics "the most crooked, you know, lying group I've ever seen." What disingenuous spin.
Kerry said this about President Bush and his administration - not "GOP critics."
8
posted on
03/12/2004 7:00:41 AM PST
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
get out the soap bar again...
9
posted on
03/12/2004 7:01:55 AM PST
by
IPWGOP
('tooning the truth)
To: tallhappy
Would be cool is Condoleza would slap him in public. Preferably on television. That would be cool.
10
posted on
03/12/2004 7:02:03 AM PST
by
kjam22
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Bush just needs to not get negative and rather than push the shortcomings of Kerry, he needs to just talk about the good things he's done in office and more important what he would do if he won again.
He can't let himself get dragged down in the mud with Kerry, otherwise it will hurt him.
I disagree with some things Bush has done/is doing, and I am not sure I would vote for him again, but I'm just tired of the last three or four elections being nothing but mud slinging.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I'm wondering:
What would it take for the media EVER to report ANYTHING done by a Dem as bad?
What would it take for the media EVER to report ANYTHING done by a Republican as good?
Dan
12
posted on
03/12/2004 7:03:12 AM PST
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: writer33
Don't press him for an apology, press him for details.
Exactly who was he talking about? Not some nebulous "they" - name them.
And what exactly are they lying about - what did they say, and what is the truth?
Kerry wouldn't be able to answer these questions, I'm sure, but he should be pressed to.
And yes, Mr. Kerry, the real issues before the country is its defense against terrorists and prosecuting the war on terrorism, as well as the confiscatory tax rates and UnConstitutional spending.
13
posted on
03/12/2004 7:03:30 AM PST
by
MrB
To: gortklattu
Wouldn't you like to see a Republican respond to these comments by saying, "That's quite an indictment, coming from a disciple of Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton"?
To: kjam22
That's exactly right. Kerry's base support is shallow and he has to keep the anger stimulated.
15
posted on
03/12/2004 7:04:13 AM PST
by
hobson
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Now that Lurch has clinced the dem nomination, use his name in the ads.
To: hobson
Yep... incredible that the party who screams about not "hating" can only be motivated by getting them to hate Bush.
17
posted on
03/12/2004 7:05:47 AM PST
by
kjam22
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I thought for all this time that he was speaking of his Damolrat party. It sure fits it to a tee.
18
posted on
03/12/2004 7:09:14 AM PST
by
Piquaboy
To: BibChr
"What would it take for the media EVER to report ANYTHING done by a Republican as good?" A wholesale change in the people within the news bidness, that's what. But the entranched liberal press, as we really all know, is not going to change its strips in this generation.
You've got to realize something that's not even in Bernie Goldberg's book Bias. Every TV reporter you see is not only trying to please his current bosses, but every report he does becomes part of his body of work which could be important as he tries to advance in his field later in career. It becomes a part of his reume.
So, in a matter of speaking, the reporters are REALLY playing to an audience of fellow newsies and news directors on whom they are relying for future income. If you've got the White House beat and you aspire to be an anchor, you don't get any closer to that chair by filing rosy reports on Republicans.
How's Atkins going for ya, Dan?
Michael
19
posted on
03/12/2004 7:13:45 AM PST
by
Wright is right!
(It's amazing how fun times when you're having flies.)
To: MrB
Good points.
20
posted on
03/12/2004 7:13:57 AM PST
by
writer33
(The U.S. Constitution defines a Conservative)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson