Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putinocracy [no CFR in Russia]
Wall Street Journal ^ | Mar 12, 2004 | GARY KASPAROV

Posted on 03/12/2004 2:34:21 AM PST by The Raven

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:51:16 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

With the policies of pre-emption being much debated today, perhaps it is unfashionable to bring up a crisis that is rapidly reaching the point of no return. On the eve of Sunday's presidential elections in Russia, Vladimir Putin is on course to complete Russia's transition into an authoritarian state -- and it will have happened while the West not only stood by, but nodded its benign approval.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Russia
KEYWORDS: russianelection

1 posted on 03/12/2004 2:34:21 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Raven
"With the policies of pre-emption being much debated today, perhaps it is unfashionable to bring up a crisis that is rapidly reaching the point of no return. On the eve of Sunday's presidential elections in Russia, Vladimir Putin is on course to complete Russia's transition into an authoritarian state -- and it will have happened while the West not only stood by, but nodded its benign approval.

Instead of waiting a few years to ask "who lost Russia?" the West must speak up now and ask more pertinent questions."



This is an interesting warning. pre-emption -- Did not Russia make that their policy in 1999?

Seems there was no outrage by anyone when that became the policy of Russia, only when President Bush delcared after 9/11 the US would have the policy of pre-emption did it become an issue.

While the liberals in this nation have been screaming and pulling their hair out over US and pre-emption, I have heard not one of them utter a sound over this policy of Russia.


"The arrest of Mikhail Khodorkovsky has little in common with the prosecution of corrupt businessmen in the U.S. He is being punished for trying to free himself and his corporation, the Yukos energy company, from state pressure. He wanted to follow the law, not the Kremlin's corrupt edicts, and for this he was arrested."

So this is the purpose of this article writen under the guise of pre-emption. The author seems to be mixing apples and oranges in an attempt to be an advocate for Mikhail Khodorkovsky.
2 posted on 03/12/2004 3:15:45 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
Why are business leaders who do not obey his orders being jailed?

Such "business leaders" like Khodorkovsky, Al Capone, Skilling or Soros should not control the economy.

3 posted on 03/15/2004 4:50:05 AM PST by A. Pole (<SARCASM> The genocide of Albanians was stopped in its tracks before it began.</S>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
It is in this environment that the Free Choice 2008 Committee was formed in Russia two months ago. Our goals are to preserve the fundamental pillars of democracy and to secure the legal election of the president of Russia in 2008. ==

Anti-putin and pro-oligakh thieves commitee. Ther chance to come to power is zero.
They advocate for Hodorkovkii an dother thives and robbers. Very eloquent but stupid.
4 posted on 03/15/2004 6:42:08 AM PST by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson