Well for starters - you're jumping to conclusions. Secondly, I would vigorously oppose such a measure. You see Mulder, political commentary and discussion of issues, are clearly not the same as "pornography". They don't ruin the innocence of children or destroy marriages or cause people to commit rape. Your arguement is foolish but you go ahead and defend Stern, Flynt, Hefner...
And they bring up that foolish arguement over and over and over again.
If Howard Stern (or any one else for that matter) is capable of destroying a marriage, then that marriage was doomed from the start.
Perhaps if couples spent more time working on *their* marriage instead of trying to control what everyone else did, the divorce rate wouldn't be so high.
your arguement is foolish but you go ahead and defend Stern, Flynt, Hefner...
"Playboy" causes rape?
If that's the case, then 95% of American males are rapists.
YOU say it isn't porn. That doesn't matter. If unelected bureaucrats at the FCC say it is though, and with some Reno types there, they could, it's then 'porn'.
AOL says the 2nd amendment is porn, so there is some precident.