Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Neets
Someone emailed John Derbyshire and made a suggestion.

Supposedly, the MA Supreme Court has put the legislature in a box, saying that they must change the laws to allow Gay marriage by May, knowing that an amendment could not be passed in time to stop it.

The person who wrote Derb suggested that the legislature could pass a law temporarily stopping all new marriage licenses in Massachusettes. That would not violate the equal protection clause of the MA constitution, and would allow there to be enough time for an amendment to be argued and either enacted or rejected.

In the interim, hetero couples who wanted to get married could go to NH or such to get hitched.

6 posted on 03/11/2004 3:07:50 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: William McKinley
I thought it takes a couple of years for any amendment proposal to become law in Massachusetts.

It has to be approved by two consecutive legislative sessions, and by the Massachusetts voters.

Will suspending marriage licenses for two years be feasible?

7 posted on 03/11/2004 3:11:35 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson