Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
From the link you provided, I found the complete text of the amendment:
"It being the public policy of this Commonwealth to protect the unique relationship of marriage, only the union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Massachusetts. Two persons of the same sex shall have the right to form a civil union, if they meet the requirements set forth by law for marriage.

"Civil unions for same sex couples are established hereunder and shall provide entirely the same benefits, protections, rights and responsibilities that are afforded to couples married under Massachusetts law. All laws applicable to marriage shall also apply to civil unions.

"This article is self-executing, but the General Court may enact laws not inconsistent with anything herein contained to carry out the purpose of this article."


18 posted on 03/11/2004 3:58:24 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: george wythe
That's like saying you can keep the title to your house but you must give up the house. That's no kind of compromise. In addition, it just puts queer marriage by another name into the constitution. Who are these compromise people? I'd like to do business with them. They give away the farm and think they've won.
20 posted on 03/11/2004 4:16:18 PM PST by King Black Robe (With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: george wythe
Thanks. I must be having a TIA, because I couldn't find that anywhere.

I'll just put on my dunce cap now...

21 posted on 03/11/2004 4:16:37 PM PST by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: george wythe
ouch, that is the compromise version that FORCES Mass to adopt civil unions! what about a version that simply outlaws same-sex marriage and leaves the rest to the lege???

33 posted on 03/12/2004 3:22:36 PM PST by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - Disturb, manipulate, demonstrate for the right thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: george wythe
I am convinced this is a defeat for conservatives.

A victory for Conservatives would have simply said:

"It being the public policy of this Commonwealth to protect the unique relationship of marriage, only the union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Massachusetts. Nothing in this Constitution can be construed to give rights of marriage to same-sex couples."
37 posted on 03/12/2004 3:28:54 PM PST by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - Disturb, manipulate, demonstrate for the right thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson