To: Destro; quidnunc; Howlin; federal; My2Cents; mountaineer; rdb3; Mo1; adam_az; petitfour; onyx
He doesn't say they're wrong, he doesn't dispute the facts: instead, he employs a time-honored device straight out of the neoconservative playbook: he tries to smear them as being from "the fringe."
That's a childish ad hominem, I honestly expected better from you! Can you show me a copy of said playbook, and where this tactic is suggested? Or are you just using this kind of labelling to paint your opponent as being.... on the fringe?
36 posted on
03/13/2004 10:05:31 AM PST by
adam_az
(Call your state Republican party office and VOLUNTEER FOR A CAMPAIGN!!!)
To: adam_az; Destro
Pat Buchanan gets 0.4% of the vote in 2000, and we're told he and his ilk are not "fringe."
37 posted on
03/13/2004 10:34:33 AM PST by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson