Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
Considering that we must get super majority agreement, how much higher can we aim right now? I wish MA would just impeach those four judges and send them a message, but I do not think that will happen. Besides, there is another court in another state ready to do the same thing. Let's see: Hawaii, Alaska, Vermont already tried with some success. Some states are still in the process of working it through their court systems. Those who seek to impose this amorality have made their strategy clear: they will win it through the courts. The media will not allow a fair and open debate.

We agree on all the fundamental stuff; we just disagree on process. What worries me is that those of us who disagree on process will lose solely because we can't agree on a strategy.

52 posted on 03/11/2004 1:26:40 PM PST by King Black Robe (With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: King Black Robe
We agree on all the fundamental stuff; we just disagree on process. What worries me is that those of us who disagree on process will lose solely because we can't agree on a strategy.

Oh my, for this issue, it's a difference without distinction. I'm all for the FMA, so "we" won't lose the FMA on account of my opinion or vote.

My concern is that some people see the FMA as enough to solve the problem. I contend it's not.

55 posted on 03/11/2004 1:37:40 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson