Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dubh_Ghlase
I actually discount the idea of Hiliary running as VP. She actively avoids high-risk gambles she can't rig, and while the payoff would be enormous, the more-likely failure would be fatal to her political career. Just ask Fritz Mondale and Bob Dole just how successful losing VP candidates are in their future ambitions to the White House (and Hiliary is no FDR, who had the benefit of 12 years and the start of the Great Depression between his failed VP run and his Presidential run).
43 posted on 03/11/2004 6:09:53 AM PST by steveegg (You don't clean up 8 years of messes in 4, only to turn it over to Pigpen - W'04))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: steveegg
Just for brainstorming & discussion....

Don't you think though that IF hillary could, along with the new jfk, manipulate the vote enough to get in, and then "arrange it" for jfk to revisit Dallas that she would take the chance? I doubt that on her own she could swing getting to the WH by herself, she needs to be swept in on someone else's coattails. Once that's done and the office is within her grasp, she will explore ways and means to make the final step into power. Conniving and manipulation is the tradmarks here. There is no restrictions to the methods used when the End justifies the Means.

Whoever embraces HRC had better have iron underwear...

50 posted on 03/11/2004 7:30:46 AM PST by Dubh_Ghlase ("Every man dies, but not every man truly lives...." Braveheart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson