Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
What puts the SAW 'over the line' for possession, in your interpretation?

And where did you come up with this view? Is it part of federal law?
71 posted on 03/11/2004 1:41:22 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
It has nothing to do with "over the line". It has to do with what the average modern soldier carries. That's my personal interpretation of the word "arms" contained in the second amendment.

You think it should be the SAW, go for it. But I don't think you can justify it, and you'll come off looking like a whack-o. Who the gun-grabbers love.

75 posted on 03/11/2004 2:09:21 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson