Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re
I question how well digital watermarking remains if you use a portion of an image or save it as a compressed jpg. Some formats are lossy and result in a degenerated reduction of an image.
100 posted on 03/10/2004 9:07:36 PM PST by weegee ('...Kerry is like that or so a crack sausage.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: weegee
I question how well digital watermarking remains if you use a portion of an image or save it as a compressed jpg.

Better than you might think, if you only use one or the other. You actually have to crop quite a bit out to destroy the watermark, and it will survive recompression much of the time.

Try this. Open the watermarked image. Rotate it 27.58 degrees counterclockwise. Save the rotated image as a Q75 progressive jpeg file. Open that saved file up. Rotate the image back to original orientation, 27.58 degrees clockwise. Crop back to the original proportions if necessary, and save the result as a Q50 standard optimized jpeg.

Congratulations, you'll just have wiped the Digimarc watermark about 99% of the time. Remember - rotate, compress, rotate back, compress again. The finished product will probably be somewhat softer than the original, but not offensively so most of the time. And actually, I just made up the numbers for how much you should rotate it - it really doesn't matter, so long as it's not a multiple of 90 degrees. ;)

116 posted on 03/10/2004 9:37:25 PM PST by general_re (The doors to Heaven and Hell are adjacent and identical... - Nikos Kazantzakis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson