Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Op-Ed: Protect Social Security Now With a Federal Retail Sales Tax
releases.usnewswire.com ^

Posted on 03/10/2004 3:01:26 PM PST by chance33_98

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: ovrtaxt
We depend on wealthy people spending their money.

So how did they manage to get wealthy without a national sales tax?

BTW, if you're in business I don't see how you can think a sales tax would change your filing requirements. You'd have to file and remit taxes once a month rather than every quarter and if you're in construction it isn't likely you'd be exempt...Oh and that means those pesky "compliance costs" are back again.

81 posted on 03/13/2004 8:20:41 AM PST by lewislynn (Free traders know it isn't , they just believe cheap popcorn makers raises their living standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
Does anyone really think social security is more important than ball players taking "performance enhancing" drugs or how soon we can get the iraqis broadband and digital cable?

I for one cannot sleep at night knowing that every Iraq man, woman and child has no TIVO. Let's spend billions more to give TIVO to every Iraqi. Then, when their folly in "Democracy" inevitably fails (like all Arab Democracies do) and they pass Sharia law, they can hurl the TIVOs at the American Embassy.

82 posted on 03/13/2004 8:29:27 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
So, instead of paying 15.3% of your paycheck in payroll taxes, plus an average of 28% of your paycheck in federal income tax, for a total of about 43% of your paycheck going to the federal government in Washington, you pay only a 23% consumption tax each time you purchase a new good or service for your own personal consumption above the federal poverty level."

How about the mortgage deduction?

83 posted on 03/13/2004 8:31:43 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
You're contradicting yourself.

No, if the proverbial rich guy is free to make the choice, he's not being penalized for his success. Only his choice to spend it on taxable items.

84 posted on 03/13/2004 9:36:30 AM PST by ovrtaxt ( http://www.fairtax.org ** G-d may not be a Republican, but Satan is definitely a Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Spotsy
The consumption tax would change my lifestyle dramatically and would be the equivalent of the govt telling me how to live.

ARGH! You can say that about any tax! How is the income tax any different in this regard? They're taxing your INCOME. Don't you have a problem with that? Marx and Engels favored taxing income. You figure it out from there.

85 posted on 03/13/2004 9:42:14 AM PST by ovrtaxt ( http://www.fairtax.org ** G-d may not be a Republican, but Satan is definitely a Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
BTW, if you're in business I don't see how you can think a sales tax would change your filing requirements. You'd have to file and remit taxes once a month rather than every quarter and if you're in construction it isn't likely you'd be exempt...Oh and that means those pesky "compliance costs" are back again.

My compliance requirements, which are in place now with FL's sales tax, are nothing compared to Federal tax. I go to quickbooks, generate a sales tax report, and copy the numbers onto a form. Then I mail it with a check. Big deal. (I do collect some sales tax on items purchased for say a "do it yourselfer" with no installation)

Complying with a 60,000 page Federal tax code is a whole different ballgame.

Look, I'm not going to change your mind, obviously. I Just can't see why you love the income tax so much. But to each his own. If you like living a quasi communist tax philosophy, be my guest.

86 posted on 03/13/2004 9:47:56 AM PST by ovrtaxt ( http://www.fairtax.org ** G-d may not be a Republican, but Satan is definitely a Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
The consumption tax would change my lifestyle dramatically and would be the equivalent of the govt telling me how to live.

ARGH! You can say that about any tax! How is the income tax any different in this regard? They're taxing your INCOME. Don't you have a problem with that? Marx and Engels favored taxing income. You figure it out from there.

1) I favor the lowest possible taxes for people of all income tax levels

2) You are completely missing my original and repeated point: people with income levels $30,000 - $200,000 will be forced to dramatically change their lifestyles if this country switches from the income tax to the "fair tax" system

The income tax system actually leaves people in the middle with more disposable income and more buying power than the "fair tax" would.

Perhaps you are financially secure and invested such that the fair tax would benefit you (I'm not bashing the wealthy - I love them and hope they get more tax breaks because they are the driving force of our economy) but, I will likely never break $200,000 in my lifetime - and there are plenty of silly things I still wish to buy like clothes, cars, travel, etc.

87 posted on 03/13/2004 11:18:44 AM PST by Spotsy (Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Spotsy
You are completely missing my original and repeated point: people with income levels $30,000 - $200,000 will be forced to dramatically change their lifestyles if this country switches from the income tax to the "fair tax" system

How do you figure that? The cost of goods will remain roughly the same. The 23% that the NRST tacks on to new items is already built in by taxing the income of the producers of that item. It's just frontloaded so that YOU ARE AWARE OF IT. (Yes, prices would drop. Market competition works.)

Plus, everyone knows the rate. Tax hikes would be met with screaming and gnashing of teeth. (Consequently, sales tax increases are rare.) If you don't want to pay it, don't buy so much. If you only spend a little, you get that money back every month anyway.

How does this system leave you with less? Where's the big alteration of lifestyle? If any changes occur, they are for the better. Savings is encouraged. Investment is encouraged. Credit card debt would drop. There would be a few years of adjustment, with some crazy fluctuations, but it would smooth out. In the end, this economy would be so thick that it would be indestructible.

Of course, they can still tax us by devaluing money, since we're not on a gold standard. But that's another battle to win.

88 posted on 03/13/2004 12:35:27 PM PST by ovrtaxt ( http://www.fairtax.org ** G-d may not be a Republican, but Satan is definitely a Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Spotsy
I personally favor some sort of flat tax; it seems to be working for the Russians. I am very cynical that Congress will do any real tax reform anytime soon. They like the stealthy theft approach as it is now. The last thing politicians want to do is to bring the whole tax system out in the open and disclose what a criminal rip-off/scam it has always been.
89 posted on 03/13/2004 12:41:46 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
The cost of goods will remain roughly the same. The 23% that the NRST tacks on to new items is already built in by taxing the income of the producers of that item.

Sounds good on paper, but in practice . . .

Whenever we try to tax the producers, somehow the consumer always pays the price.

90 posted on 03/13/2004 2:07:06 PM PST by Spotsy (Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
I could go along with you and Forbes and support a flat tax. Just don't let Hillary set the rate, please! :)
91 posted on 03/13/2004 2:09:02 PM PST by Spotsy (Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Spotsy
Exactly my point.
92 posted on 03/13/2004 6:22:02 PM PST by ovrtaxt ( http://www.fairtax.org ** G-d may not be a Republican, but Satan is definitely a Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson