Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/10/2004 1:44:52 PM PST by kimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kimber
Cubin and Young are each under an affirmative obligation to avoid conflicts or appearances of conflicts due to their NRA position

Their NRA position is pro 2nd Amendment. Do we take this further & say they can't speak freely on anything because of their position on the 1st Amendment?

Are these not one in the same?

BEHOLD! The mind of the defenseless

2 posted on 03/10/2004 1:50:02 PM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *bang_list
Boy o boy, what will these devious Marxists think of next?

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

4 posted on 03/10/2004 1:52:56 PM PST by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kimber
Everytime in those areas where gun control nuts have established anti gun laws and an unarmed woman or child is raped beaten or murdered...they should be allowed to sue the Brady Bunch....
And every govt offical or politican who helped bring such insanity on the victims
5 posted on 03/10/2004 1:54:00 PM PST by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kimber
"The Brady Campaign's letter pointed to a conflict of interest stemming from Young's and Cubin's active support of H.R. 1036, which gives broad immunity to gun manufacturers, dealers and trade associations from civil litigation. The NRA, as a "trade association," would benefit from the measure."

Firstly, the NRA is not a "trade association", it is a civil rights and safety organization. Secondly, how about the "conflict of interest" on the part of "Lousy" Lautenberg, "Turkey" Teddy Kennedy, "Upchuck" Schumer, and others who act as shills for the "Brady bunch" of knee-jerk anti-gunners.

Cheez---GIVE ME A BREAK!!!! These people had NO SHAME.

7 posted on 03/10/2004 2:07:38 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kimber
These people are dead serious about disarming us. We've got to stop them. It's obvious that bunch of jack*sses in Congress aren't going to do anything.
8 posted on 03/10/2004 2:07:50 PM PST by NRA2BFree (The Socialists are in control of our Congress. It's time to clean house!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kimber
What about Dianne Feinswine and being a board member of CEASEFIRE?
9 posted on 03/10/2004 2:11:34 PM PST by Dan from Michigan (""....but we're not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America"")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kimber
If they want the NRA held civilly liable, when can we push to have the ACLU held civilly liable for their actions? Hmmmmm?
10 posted on 03/10/2004 2:14:16 PM PST by Prime Choice (Hm? No, my powers can only be used for Good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kimber
Anybody got a legally accurate definition of 'trade organization' and how the NRA (a member organization representing the political and sporting interests of its members, not representing the gun trade) would meet that definition?
12 posted on 03/10/2004 2:32:10 PM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kimber
Doesn't the Brady Campaign and Million Moms financially benefit from contributions based on the increased violence generated from pursuing their policies?

16 posted on 03/11/2004 7:42:14 AM PST by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson