Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeStLouisGuy
One thing I will disagree with regarding Rush's analysis on Martha.

He said that she lied and that was her downfall. He also commented that she should have left the lying to the professionals, alluding to the Clintons who would instinctively know to say something like "I don't remember".

The part I disagree with is that there is conclusive proof that she lied at all. Other than that I would agree that he "nailed it" right on.

This whole episode again strenghtens my belief that the last place an innocent person want to find themselves is at the trial stage of our justice system.

13 posted on 03/10/2004 8:52:31 AM PST by evad (Cut taxes again. Cut spending. Cut Guv Regulations. Cut Guv Programs...Repeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: evad
Let anyone who has never lied, be the ones to cast the stones at Martha Stewart. If this rule were applied, I suspect there would be no stone throwers.

Bill Clinton was a really big liar, and yes, he did it unter oath.

Free Martha Stewart!
27 posted on 03/10/2004 9:44:41 AM PST by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: evad
Martha was/is a "big girl"....if she can form a billion-dollar co. she has the smarts to know right from wrong....if not, her lawyers could have told her that....in the end, I believe she made the call on going to trial -- NOT her lawyers....
47 posted on 03/10/2004 11:49:06 AM PST by ConservativeStLouisGuy (transplanted St Louisan living in Canada, eh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson