To: ConservativeStLouisGuy
One thing I will disagree with regarding Rush's analysis on Martha.
He said that she lied and that was her downfall. He also commented that she should have left the lying to the professionals, alluding to the Clintons who would instinctively know to say something like "I don't remember".
The part I disagree with is that there is conclusive proof that she lied at all. Other than that I would agree that he "nailed it" right on.
This whole episode again strenghtens my belief that the last place an innocent person want to find themselves is at the trial stage of our justice system.
13 posted on
03/10/2004 8:52:31 AM PST by
evad
(Cut taxes again. Cut spending. Cut Guv Regulations. Cut Guv Programs...Repeat)
To: evad
Let anyone who has never lied, be the ones to cast the stones at Martha Stewart. If this rule were applied, I suspect there would be no stone throwers.
Bill Clinton was a really big liar, and yes, he did it unter oath.
Free Martha Stewart!
27 posted on
03/10/2004 9:44:41 AM PST by
tessalu
To: evad
Martha was/is a "big girl"....if she can form a billion-dollar co. she has the smarts to know right from wrong....if not, her lawyers could have told her that....in the end, I believe she made the call on going to trial -- NOT her lawyers....
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson