Skip to comments.
Class Envy Got Martha Stewart
RushLimbaugh.com ^
| 3-9-04
| Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 03/10/2004 8:28:00 AM PST by ConservativeStLouisGuy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: King Black Robe
Looking back at the transcript (after listening to it on the radio yesterday), I can see your point....you know, I'm thinking Rush is so used to spotting seminar callers that he just jumped a little too quickly on that call....also perhaps his cochliar implant was working properly at that moment and he "heard" something that wasn't even said....
FReegards,
- ConservativeStLouisGuy
To: alnick
Yes, I concur, but at least 'ole Willie Boy has that "impeached" moniker under his name for the history books (sweet justice!)....
To: King Black Robe
I agree with the caller and you. Stewart broke the law and is now paying the consequences. She knew what she was doing, she's not stupid (except for the whole breaking the law thingy). The fact that she is a rich celebrity did not help any, but she did not get convicted of being rich and famous.
Cramer of CNBC said that the one way you make white collar crime go away is to put these people away. Fines are nothing to them.
43
posted on
03/10/2004 11:41:22 AM PST
by
KC_Conspirator
(This space outsourced to India)
To: WayneM
I understand your point....please don't give up on Rushbo....if you count the numbers of times he HAS been right versus the wrong times his track record is LIGHT YEARS ahead of the media out there....take this from one who knows -- I've been listening to Rush for over 15 years now....and have learned to take some of the things he says (when he's wrong -- which isn't that often) with a grain of salt...
To: Peter Libra
The Canadian media up here was pretty even-handed (even in this Liberal La-La Land) on the whole Martha thing....I see your points....Rush says things how he sees them....I have learned a LOT from him in 15 years.....even at those time I didn't agree with him (which have been far and few-between)...
To: biblewonk
Hey, man, lighten up! It IS a three-hour show and he has to say something! (Look at my other responses in this thread regarding my take on how other replies felt on this)...
To: evad
Martha was/is a "big girl"....if she can form a billion-dollar co. she has the smarts to know right from wrong....if not, her lawyers could have told her that....in the end, I believe she made the call on going to trial -- NOT her lawyers....
To: claudiustg
Heheheheheh.....good one....
To: Endeavor
I tend to disagree with you....remember the name Leona Helmsley.....and all that....VERY similar stuff here -- EXCEPT that in this case the media LIKES Martha...they didn't like Leona...
To: Pylot
Good point....by the way I AM over the Clintons (thank GOD I am!)...
To: Tanniker Smith
Dittos on that....BRAVO!!!!!
To: ZULU
I concur....Rush is probably inserting his opinions based on the lawsuit in Florida he is involved in.....good point....
To: ConservativeStLouisGuy
Stupidity got Martha. She's on the freaking board she should have known better. After Enronitis the feds were looking for a symbol to string up, she should have known better. Across the board Martha should have freaking known better, but she was dumb and now she's gonna do jail time for stupidity. Trying to write this off as class envy is raw stupidity on Rush's part, it's the equivalent of the race card and misused almost as often.
53
posted on
03/10/2004 11:58:21 AM PST
by
discostu
(but this one has 11)
To: Poohbah
Ask him the source of the info. If he gets really evasive, don't act on the tip. If he tells you that he has a "source" at XYZ Corporation who saw the financials that won't be released until the end of the month. Untill you asked the question it was a market rumor. Once you knew he was passing along insider information (like Martha did) you can not legally act on the information.
She will lose her civil case.
Rush needs to check his facts. Non insiders can and do trade on inside information.
54
posted on
03/10/2004 12:01:01 PM PST
by
Dinsdale
To: ConservativeStLouisGuy
dumb druggie logic
55
posted on
03/10/2004 12:11:30 PM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(Despise not the jester. Often he is the only one telling the truth)
To: ConservativeStLouisGuy
A friend here at work just splaint the whole situation to me and now I think she got what she deserved. The stock sell was nothing, it was her thinking she could win a pissing match against the NYC DA and SEC that was really arrogant of her.
56
posted on
03/10/2004 12:11:53 PM PST
by
biblewonk
(I must try to answer all bible questions.)
To: agarrett
Stewart knew that Waksal was selling shares, because her broker told her. No. She knew Waskal was selling shares because Waskal's broker told her. That is insider information - not market information
57
posted on
03/10/2004 12:16:23 PM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(Despise not the jester. Often he is the only one telling the truth)
To: Oztrich Boy
No. She knew Waskal was selling shares because Waskal's broker told her. That is insider information - not market information I'm sorry, but that's incorrect. It doesn't matter who told her. Selling shares is market information, regardless of the source. The reason behind the sales may or may not be inside information - but no one is alleging she was told that.
Drew Garrett
58
posted on
03/10/2004 12:30:27 PM PST
by
agarrett
To: ConservativeStLouisGuy
It always amazes me how easy it is for me to miscommunicate when writing email.
I meant for Rush to get over the Clinton double standard. Of course, I am not being singled out for double treatment for doctor shopping either so maybe his sensitivity is justified or at least understandable.
I too, am over the Clintons and feeling better every day in every way!
59
posted on
03/10/2004 12:38:12 PM PST
by
Pylot
To: ConservativeStLouisGuy
So you're saying class envy made Martha lie to the feds?
60
posted on
03/10/2004 12:49:16 PM PST
by
Endeavor
(Don't count your Hatch before it chickens)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson