Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN
You can't refute that ICR is right that there is too much unaccounted for C-14 in those fossils.

Perhaps this will refresh your memory:

FIGURE 4. Movement of water producing the seepage
within the Purslane sandstones.
Movement of water producing the seepage

201 posted on 03/12/2004 8:23:05 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
> Perhaps this will refresh your memory: Yes, of course now I remember, a picture is worth a thousand words. Especially if the words don't make sense. Ecsher stairscases work like that. It seems like little steps repeated billions of times would get you somewhere doesn't it? But one good mutation and two bad doesn't really help. And the odds aren't that good. M.C. Escher - Ascending and Descending
206 posted on 03/13/2004 8:30:47 AM PST by vessel (How long has your candle been burning? Only you and the light know for sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

To: VadeRetro
If groundwater contamination of fossils is the answer though, then you really have to question how many other elements that are used as either parent or daughter elements have leached into and out of fossils? If c14 can leach in, then C12 can too. If C14 can leach in then C14 can leach out also. Are any of the Radiometric dating methods immune to such contamination?
209 posted on 03/13/2004 11:34:54 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson