Replies

Had to leave after the first segment, but Bernard Goldberg did great, saying that whether or not the use of 9/11 images is appropriate is up to each voter -- his concern is that the media shirked their responsibility by not making clear the history and agenda of Families for Peaceful Tomorrows, or their connection to the Heinz Foundation.

Alan Colmes kept trying to change the debate to "But don't 9/11 families have a right to protest the ads?" and Goldberg kept saying "Of course," but telling Colmes repeatedly that Colmes was (deliberately?) oblivious to his point: just who were these family members, what was their political agenda, and especially, how were they financed? He said if the shoe were on the other foot and there was a group financed by a "right-wing Republican" the media would have been all over the funding story.