[UCANSEE2]

Not innocent, true.

Prosecutable yes.


Why her, though? Why not the others who routinely use insider trading to make much much more on their investments than YOU?

Well, now, we don't want the public knowing that the insiders use their knowledge to profit, which means they are STEALING FROM YOU, if you don't have the same insider info.

Must keep the game protected. Must keep the investing public happy so they invest their dollars, so we can make millions of dollars.

[rdb3]

Why her, though? Why not the others who routinely use insider trading to make much much more on their investments than YOU?

She was the one charged and tried. Let the others be charged and tried. They have not so far. She has. And has been convicted.

Well, now, we don't want the public knowing that the insiders use their knowledge to profit, which means they are STEALING FROM YOU, if you don't have the same insider info.

We're talking about two different things. I'm talking about Martha Stewart specifically. In this case, she was all that mattered or should have mattered.

Must keep the game protected. Must keep the investing public happy so they invest their dollars, so we can make millions of dollars.

You are most welcome to your opinions. However, this is outside the purview of this case.

Show 'em my motto!