Posted on 03/09/2004 10:50:23 AM PST by g_f_axelsen
No, I think it's you ...
I've had opportunities to solve some of the more challenging REAL-LIFE engineering, technical problems I've been presented; but YOU don't count. See my previous post for reasons why ...
See, there you go thinking again. : )
Actually, _Jim, I think we are getting way off the subject, and dwelling in the personal attack area.
Frankly, I apologize for my attacks. Let me just say that I believe that Martha was investigated, tried, convicted, and will be serving time for her violation of law. This we both agree on.
I also believe that she was pursued, while others ignored, and her conviction and sentencing was likely based on her 'attitude' rather than on the level of her crime. You differ on this part, and that is your right. Neither of us can 'prove' this last part, so let's just say we merely disagree on some of the circumstances, but she was not unfairly convicted. She committed a crime.
Back to you, sir.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.