Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Columbine; KQQL
I agree that McInnis is the best candidate, although I also think others could win the seat, like Coffman or perhaps Beauprez. I would prefer that Beauprez hold onto his swing district with his incumbency advantage.

I also agree Tancredo is too polarizing to win unless the Dims rip themselves to shreds in a primary. Allard and Beauprez were both helped in close races by Catholic, Hispanic pro-lifers who were turned off by the Dims' pro-abortion rhetoric. Tancredo wouldn't get those votes.

51 posted on 03/09/2004 12:15:38 PM PST by colorado tanker ("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker
Here is the rating of GOP nominee who can hold the seat .


1)McInnis
2) Coffman
3) Bob.Shaffer
4) Beauprez.

-------

best GOP candidate to lose the GOP seat (TOM T)
54 posted on 03/09/2004 12:18:51 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: colorado tanker
Water policy will play a large part in the race and Scott McInnis is from the Western Slope ( not many voters). Owens is out because of personal matters. Mike Coffman has state wide appeal and Bob Beauprez is attractive no matter where he runs. Tom Tancredo relishes being a ligntening rod and would have a tough time outside of his very Republican district. Too bad Dick Wadhams is otherwise occupied.

But then I am just a Connecticut Yankee missing her old state buddies.
90 posted on 03/09/2004 6:24:34 PM PST by lighthouse (CH in CT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson