[Bluntpoint]

Again, they are not going to discuss appealable issues that are not present in this instant case.

There is no discussion here probably because an instruction, etc, was not challenged by the defense that could be associated with later juror comments.

I'm sorry that a lay person like yourself has trouble wrapping your head around that.

Look up the Federal Rules of procedure. It is a thick book. Most of which is not discussed by the talking heads in Martha's case because they are irrelevant to the case at hand.

Now, I'm going to find some urologist and tell him I know more than he concerning testicular misfires.

I'll ping you into such discussion when it gets hot and heavy.

[Howlin]

Again, they are not going to discuss appealable issues that are not present in this instant case.

Well, I have to apologize. I evidently have been misreading your posts; I didn't realize we were discussing ALL cases.

DUH on my part.