[Bluntpoint]

Reread my original post.

You made a sweeping statement about what is and is not appealable.

I pointed out to you that you were mistaken.

No where did I say that this would be an appealable issue in the instant case.

However, you seem to think that if some talking head did not address all the rules of civil procedure when discussing this particular case, that somehow the rules not mentioned do not exist.

[Howlin]

Well, then WHERE is the rule for federal cases?

I have stated repeatedly that I have HEARD lawyers say that those are the only grounds that can be appealed. Now, unless all those lawyers in all those articles and on all those talk shows don't know as much as you do, you'd think ONE of them would have mentioned that as a possibility, wouldn't you?